The performance of two in-clinic markerless motion capture systems compared to a laboratory standard.
Steen Harsted(University of Southern Denmark), Per Kjær(University of Southern Denmark), Raymond Guan(University of Alberta), Bue Bonderup Hesby(University of Southern Denmark), Greg Kawchuk(University of Alberta), Eleanor Boyle(Indiana University Northwest), Tue Skallgård(University of Southern Denmark)
University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)
March 21, 2019
Cited by 3
Related Papers
Risk of Vertebrobasilar Stroke and Chiropractic Care
|Spine|2008|285
Systematic Review of Return to Work After Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: Results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis
|Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation|2014|234
Sex-specific relevance of diabetes to occlusive vascular and other mortality: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual data from 980 793 adults from 68 prospective studies
|The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology|2018|228
Comparison of 10-mg and 5-mg Warfarin Initiation Nomograms Together with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Outpatient Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism
|Annals of Internal Medicine|2003|222
A conceptual framework for prognostic research
|BMC Medical Research Methodology|2020|193