Consensus Nomenclature for Reporting Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Data

Richard F. Spaide(Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York), Glenn J. Jaffe(Duke University), David Sarraf(University of California, Los Angeles), K. Bailey Freund(Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York), SriniVas R. Sadda(University of California, Los Angeles), Giovanni Staurenghi(San Raffaele University of Rome), Nadia K. Waheed(Tufts University), Usha Chakravarthy(Queen's University Belfast), Philip J. Rosenfeld(University of Miami), Frank G. Holz(University of Bonn), Eric H. Souied(Université Paris-Est Créteil), Salomon Y. Cohen(Centre Ophtalmologique d'Imagerie et de Laser), Giuseppe Querques(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), Kyoko Ohno‐Matsui(Tokyo Medical and Dental University), David S. Boyer(Retina Vitreous Associates Medical Group), Alain Gaudric(Université Paris Cité), Barbara Blodi, Caroline R. Baumal(Tufts University), Xiaoxin Li(Peking University), G. Coscas(Université Paris-Sud), Alexander J. Brucker(University of Pennsylvania), Lawrence J. Singerman(University School), Philip J. Luthert(University College London), Steffen Schmitz-Valckenberg(University of Bonn), Ursula Schmidt‐Erfurth(Vienna General Hospital), Hans E. Grossniklaus(Emory Eye Center), David J. Wilson(Oregon Health & Science University), Robyn H. Guymer(The University of Melbourne), Lawrence A. Yannuzzi(Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants of New York), Emily Y. Chew(National Institutes of Health), Karl G. Csaky(Texas Retina Associates (United States)), Jordi Monés(Barcelona Macula Foundation), Daniel Pauleikhoff(St. Franziskus Hospital), Ramin Tadayoni(Université Paris Cité), James G. Fujimoto(Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Ophthalmology
November 14, 2019
Cited by 776Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PurposeTo establish a process to evaluate and standardize a state-of-the-art nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) data.DesignConsensus meeting.ParticipantsAn international panel of retina specialists, imaging and image reading center experts, and ocular pathologists.MethodsDuring several meetings organized under the auspices of the Macula Society, an international study group discussed and codified a set nomenclature framework for classifying the subtypes of neovascular AMD and associated lesion components.Main Outcome MeasuresA consensus classification of neovascular AMD.ResultsThe study group created a standardized working definition of AMD. The components of neovascular AMD were defined and subclassified. Disease consequences of macular neovascularization were delineated.ConclusionsThe framework of a consensus nomenclature system, a definition of AMD, and a delineation of the subtypes of neovascular AMD were developed. Establishing a uniform set of definitions will facilitate comparison of diverse patient groups and different studies. The framework presented is modified and updated readily, processes that are anticipated to occur on a periodic basis. The study group suggests that the consensus standards outlined in this article be used in future reported studies of neovascular AMD and clinical practice. To establish a process to evaluate and standardize a state-of-the-art nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) data. Consensus meeting. An international panel of retina specialists, imaging and image reading center experts, and ocular pathologists. During several meetings organized under the auspices of the Macula Society, an international study group discussed and codified a set nomenclature framework for classifying the subtypes of neovascular AMD and associated lesion components. A consensus classification of neovascular AMD. The study group created a standardized working definition of AMD. The components of neovascular AMD were defined and subclassified. Disease consequences of macular neovascularization were delineated. The framework of a consensus nomenclature system, a definition of AMD, and a delineation of the subtypes of neovascular AMD were developed. Establishing a uniform set of definitions will facilitate comparison of diverse patient groups and different studies. The framework presented is modified and updated readily, processes that are anticipated to occur on a periodic basis. The study group suggests that the consensus standards outlined in this article be used in future reported studies of neovascular AMD and clinical practice.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis