Status of care for end stage kidney disease in countries and regions worldwide: international cross sectional survey

Aminu K. Bello(University of Alberta), Adeera Levin(University of British Columbia), Meaghan Lunney(University of Calgary), Mohamed A. Osman(University of Ottawa), Ye Feng(University of Alberta), Gloria Ashuntantang(Université de Yaoundé I), Ezequiel Bellorín-Font(Saint Louis University), Mohammed Benghanem Gharbi(University of Hassan II Casablanca), Sara N. Davison(University of Alberta), Mohammad Ghnaimat(Specialty Hospital, Jordan), Paul Harden(Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust), Htay Htay(Singapore General Hospital), Vivekanand Jha(Manipal Academy of Higher Education), Kamyar Kalantar‐Zadeh(University of California, Irvine Medical Center), Peter G. Kerr(Monash Medical Centre), Scott Klarenbach(University of Alberta), Csaba P. Kövesdy(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Valérie A. Luyckx(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Brendon L. Neuen(The George Institute for Global Health), Dónal O’Donoghue(Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust), Shahrzad Ossareh(Iran University of Medical Sciences), Jeffrey Perl(St. Michael's Hospital), Harun Ur Rashid(Child Health Research Foundation), Éric Rondeau(Sorbonne Université), Emily See(The University of Melbourne), Syed Saad(University of Alberta), Laura Solá, Irma Tchokhonelidze(Tbilisi State Medical University), Vladimı́r Tesař(Charles University), Kriang Tungsanga(Chulalongkorn University), Rümeyza Kazancıoğlu(Bezmiâlem Vakıf Üniversitesi), Angela Yee‐Moon Wang(Queen Mary Hospital), Natasha Wiebe(University of Alberta), Chih‐Wei Yang(Chang Gung University), Alexander Zemchenkov(First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg), Ming‐Hui Zhao(Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China), Kitty J. Jager(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Fergus Caskey(North Bristol NHS Trust), Vlado Perkovic(UNSW Sydney), Kailash Jindal(University of Alberta), Ikechi G. Okpechi(University of Cape Town), Marcello Tonelli(University of Calgary), John Feehally(University of Leicester), David C.H. Harris(The University of Sydney), David W. Johnson(Translational Research Institute)
BMJ
October 31, 2019
Cited by 271Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the global capacity (availability, accessibility, quality, and affordability) to deliver kidney replacement therapy (dialysis and transplantation) and conservative kidney management. DESIGN: International cross sectional survey. SETTING: International Society of Nephrology (ISN) survey of 182 countries from July to September 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Key stakeholders identified by ISN's national and regional leaders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Markers of national capacity to deliver core components of kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management. RESULTS: Responses were received from 160 (87.9%) of 182 countries, comprising 97.8% (7338.5 million of 7501.3 million) of the world's population. A wide variation was found in capacity and structures for kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management-namely, funding mechanisms, health workforce, service delivery, and available technologies. Information on the prevalence of treated end stage kidney disease was available in 91 (42%) of 218 countries worldwide. Estimates varied more than 800-fold from 4 to 3392 per million population. Rwanda was the only low income country to report data on the prevalence of treated disease; 5 (<10%) of 53 African countries reported these data. Of 159 countries, 102 (64%) provided public funding for kidney replacement therapy. Sixty eight (43%) of 159 countries charged no fees at the point of care delivery and 34 (21%) made some charge. Haemodialysis was reported as available in 156 (100%) of 156 countries, peritoneal dialysis in 119 (76%) of 156 countries, and kidney transplantation in 114 (74%) of 155 countries. Dialysis and kidney transplantation were available to more than 50% of patients in only 108 (70%) and 45 (29%) of 154 countries that offered these services, respectively. Conservative kidney management was available in 124 (81%) of 154 countries. Worldwide, the median number of nephrologists was 9.96 per million population, which varied with income level. CONCLUSIONS: These comprehensive data show the capacity of countries (including low income countries) to provide optimal care for patients with end stage kidney disease. They demonstrate substantial variability in the burden of such disease and capacity for kidney replacement therapy and conservative kidney management, which have implications for policy.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis