Health Status After Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
Suzanne J. Baron(Harvard University), David J. Cohen(Baim Institute for Clinical Research), Michael J. Mack(Baylor Jack and Jane Hamilton Heart and Vascular Hospital), Susheel Kodali(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Maria Alu(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), John G. Webb(St. Paul's Hospital), Raj Makkar(Cedars-Sinai Medical Center), Khaja Chinnakondepalli(Saint Luke's Hospital), Alan Zajarías(Washington University in St. Louis), Howard C. Herrmann(University of Pennsylvania), Mathew Williams(Mount Sinai Health System), Dean J. Kereiakes(Health Net), Elizabeth A. Magnuson(Saint Luke's Health System), Samir Kapadia(Cleveland Clinic), Kaijun Wang(Saint Luke's Hospital), Michael Lu(Children's Hospital of Los Angeles), Martin B. Leon(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Vinod H. Thourani(Valve (United States)), Craig R. Smith(University of Arizona), Vasilis Babaliaros(Valve (United States))
Cited by 90
Related Papers
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation for Aortic Stenosis in Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgery
|New England Journal of Medicine|2010|7.2k
Transcatheter versus Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in High-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2011|6.4k
Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials
|Circulation|2007|5.4k
Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2016|5.1k
Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients
|New England Journal of Medicine|2019|4.8k