Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Antonio González-Martı́n(Biomedical Research Institute), Bhavana Pothuri(NYU Langone Health), Ignace Vergote(KU Leuven), René dePont Christensen(University of Southern Denmark), Whitney A. Spannuth Graybill(Medical University of South Carolina), Mansoor R. Mirza(Rigshospitalet), Colleen McCormick, Domenica Lorusso(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Paul Hoskins(McGill University), Gilles Freyer(Hôpital Lyon Sud), Klaus Baumann(Klinikum Ludwigshafen), К. Jardon(McGill University Health Centre), Andrés Redondo(Institut Català d'Oncologia), Richard G. Moore(University of Rochester), Christof Vulsteke(University of Antwerp), Roisin E. O’Cearbhaill(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Bente Lund(Aalborg University), Floor Backes(The Ohio State University), Pilar Barretina-Ginesta(University of Girona), Ashley Haggerty(University of Pennsylvania), María Jesús Rubio-Pérez(Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group), Mark S. Shahin(Thomas Jefferson University), Giorgia Mangili(Vita-Salute San Raffaele University), William H. Bradley(Medical College of Wisconsin), Ilan Bruchim(Technion – Israel Institute of Technology), Kaiming Sun(GlaxoSmithKline (United States)), Izabela A. Malinowska(GlaxoSmithKline (United States)), Yong Li(GlaxoSmithKline (United States)), Divya Gupta(Tesaro (United States)), Bradley J. Monk(Creighton University)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 28, 2019
Cited by 2,237Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: mutations. The efficacy of niraparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy is unknown. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib or placebo once daily after a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival in patients who had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency and in those in the overall population, as determined on hierarchical testing. A prespecified interim analysis for overall survival was conducted at the time of the primary analysis of progression-free survival. RESULTS: Of the 733 patients who underwent randomization, 373 (50.9%) had tumors with homologous-recombination deficiency. Among the patients in this category, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer in the niraparib group than in the placebo group (21.9 months vs. 10.4 months; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.59; P<0.001). In the overall population, the corresponding progression-free survival was 13.8 months and 8.2 months (hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.76; P<0.001). At the 24-month interim analysis, the rate of overall survival was 84% in the niraparib group and 77% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.11). The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were anemia (in 31.0% of the patients), thrombocytopenia (in 28.7%), and neutropenia (in 12.8%). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer who had a response to platinum-based chemotherapy, those who received niraparib had significantly longer progression-free survival than those who received placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of homologous-recombination deficiency. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02655016.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis