The Association between Supraphysiologic Arterial Oxygen Levels and Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Observational Cohort Study

Edward Palmer(Bury College), Benjamin Post(National Health Service), Roman Klapaukh, Giampiero Marra(University College London), Niall MacCallum(Bury College), David Brealey(Bury College), Ari Ercole(University of Cambridge), Andrew Jones(Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust), Simon Ashworth(Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust), Peter Watkinson(University of Oxford), Richard Beale(King's College London), Stephen J. Brett(Imperial College London), Duncan Young(University of Oxford), Claire Black(University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Aasiyah Rashan, Daniel Martín(The Royal Free Hospital), Mervyn Singer(Bury College), Steve Harris(Bury College)
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
September 12, 2019
Cited by 108Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Abstract Rationale There is conflicting evidence on harm related to exposure to supraphysiologic PaO2 (hyperoxemia) in critically ill patients. Objectives To examine the association between longitudinal exposure to hyperoxemia and mortality in patients admitted to ICUs in five United Kingdom university hospitals. Methods A retrospective cohort of ICU admissions between January 31, 2014, and December 31, 2018, from the National Institute of Health Research Critical Care Health Informatics Collaborative was studied. Multivariable logistic regression modeled death in ICU by exposure to hyperoxemia. Measurements and Main Results Subsets with oxygen exposure windows of 0 to 1, 0 to 3, 0 to 5, and 0 to 7 days were evaluated, capturing 19,515, 10,525, 6,360, and 4,296 patients, respectively. Hyperoxemia dose was defined as the area between the PaO2 time curve and a boundary of 13.3 kPa (100 mm Hg) divided by the hours of potential exposure (24, 72, 120, or 168 h). An association was found between exposure to hyperoxemia and ICU mortality for exposure windows of 0 to 1 days (odds ratio [OR], 1.15; 95% compatibility interval [CI], 0.95–1.38; P = 0.15), 0 to 3 days (OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.04–1.74; P = 0.02), 0 to 5 days (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.07–2.13; P = 0.02), and 0 to 7 days (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.11–2.72; P = 0.02). However, a dose–response relationship was not observed. There was no evidence to support a differential effect between hyperoxemia and either a respiratory diagnosis or mechanical ventilation. Conclusions An association between hyperoxemia and mortality was observed in our large, unselected multicenter cohort. The absence of a dose–response relationship weakens causal interpretation. Further experimental research is warranted to elucidate this important question.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis