Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis of the Value of Microsatellite Instability As a Biomarker in Gastric Cancer

Filippo Pietrantonio(University of Milan), Rosalba Miceli(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Alessandra Raimondi(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Young‐Woo Kim(National Cancer Center), Won Ki Kang(Samsung Medical Center), Ruth E. Langley(University College London), Yoon Young Choi(Yonsei University), Kyoung-Mee Kim(Samsung Medical Center), Matthew Nankivell(University College London), Federica Morano(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Andrew Wotherspoon(Institute of Cancer Research), Nicola Valeri(Institute of Cancer Research), Myeong‐Cherl Kook(National Cancer Center), Ji Yeong An(Samsung Medical Center), Heike I. Grabsch(University of Leeds), Giovanni Fucà(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Sung Hoon Noh(Yonsei University), Tae Sung Sohn(Samsung Medical Center), Sung Kim(Samsung Medical Center), Maria Di Bartolomeo(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), David Cunningham(Institute of Cancer Research), Jeeyun Lee(Samsung Medical Center), Jae‐Ho Cheong(Yonsei University), Elizabeth Smyth(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
September 12, 2019
Cited by 473Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE In the CLASSIC and MAGIC trials, microsatellite instability (MSI)–high status was a favorable prognostic and potential negative predictive factor for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer (GC). Given the low prevalence of MSI-high status in GC and its association with other positive prognostic variables, large data sets are needed to draw robust evidence of its prognostic/predictive value. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a multinational, individual-patient-data meta-analysis of the prognostic/predictive role of MSI in patients with resectable GC enrolled in the MAGIC, CLASSIC, ARTIST, and ITACA-S trials. Prognostic analyses used multivariable Cox models (MVM). The predictive role of MSI was assessed both in an all-comer population and in MAGIC and CLASSIC trials by MVM testing of the interaction of treatment (chemotherapy plus surgery v surgery) with MSI. RESULTS MSI status was available for 1,556 patients: 121 (7.8%) had MSI-high status; 576 were European, and 980 were Asian. In MSI-high versus MSI-low/microsatellite stable (MSS) comparisons, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was 71.8% (95% CI, 63.8% to 80.7%) versus 52.3% (95% CI, 49.7% to 55.1%); the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 77.5% (95% CI, 70.0% to 85.8%) versus 59.3% (95% CI, 56.6% to 62.1%). In MVM, MSI was associated with longer DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.76; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.17 to 2.73; P = .008), as were pT, pN, ethnicity, and treatment. Patients with MSI-low/MSS GC benefitted from chemotherapy plus surgery: the 5-year DFS compared with surgery only was 57% versus 41% (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.79), and the 5-year OS was 62% versus 53% (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.94). Conversely, those with MSI-high GC did not: the 5-year DFS was 70% versus 77% (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 0.53 to 3.04), and the 5-year OS was 75% versus 83% (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.55 to 4.12). CONCLUSION In patients with resectable primary GC, MSI is a robust prognostic marker that should be adopted as a stratification factor by clinical trials. Chemotherapy omission and/or immune checkpoint blockade should be investigated prospectively in MSI-high GCs according to clinically and pathologically defined risk of relapse.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis