Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction

Shamir R. Mehta(Population Health Research Institute), David Wood(University of British Columbia), Robert F. Storey(Population Health Research Institute), Roxana Mehran(Hospital Universitario La Paz), Kevin R. Bainey(University of Alberta), Helen Nguyen(Population Health Research Institute), Brandi Meeks(Population Health Research Institute), Giuseppe Di Pasquale(Population Health Research Institute), José López-Sendón(Hospital Universitario La Paz), David P. Faxon(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Laura Mauri(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Sunil V. Rao(Population Health Research Institute), Laurent J. Feldman(Population Health Research Institute), Philippe Gabríel Steg(Population Health Research Institute), Álvaro Avezum(Population Health Research Institute), Tej Sheth(Population Health Research Institute), Natalia Pinilla‐Echeverri(Population Health Research Institute), Raúl Moreno(Hospital Universitario La Paz), Gianluca Campo(Cardiovascular Institute of the South), Benjamin Wrigley(Population Health Research Institute), Saško Kedev(Population Health Research Institute), Andrew G.C. Sutton(Population Health Research Institute), Richard Oliver(Population Health Research Institute), Josep Rodés‐Cabau(Population Health Research Institute), Goran Stanković(Population Health Research Institute), Robert C. Welsh(University of Alberta), Shahar Lavi(London Health Sciences Centre), Warren J. Cantor(University of Toronto), Jia Wang(Population Health Research Institute), Juliet Nakamya(Population Health Research Institute), Shrikant I. Bangdiwala(Population Health Research Institute), John A. Cairns(University of British Columbia)
New England Journal of Medicine
September 1, 2019
Cited by 902Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the culprit lesion reduces the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction. Whether PCI of nonculprit lesions further reduces the risk of such events is unclear. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease who had undergone successful culprit-lesion PCI to a strategy of either complete revascularization with PCI of angiographically significant nonculprit lesions or no further revascularization. Randomization was stratified according to the intended timing of nonculprit-lesion PCI (either during or after the index hospitalization). The first coprimary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction; the second coprimary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 3 years, the first coprimary outcome had occurred in 158 of the 2016 patients (7.8%) in the complete-revascularization group as compared with 213 of the 2025 patients (10.5%) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60 to 0.91; P = 0.004). The second coprimary outcome had occurred in 179 patients (8.9%) in the complete-revascularization group as compared with 339 patients (16.7%) in the culprit-lesion-only PCI group (hazard ratio, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.61; P<0.001). For both coprimary outcomes, the benefit of complete revascularization was consistently observed regardless of the intended timing of nonculprit-lesion PCI (P = 0.62 and P = 0.27 for interaction for the first and second coprimary outcomes, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease, complete revascularization was superior to culprit-lesion-only PCI in reducing the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction, as well as the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and others; COMPLETE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01740479.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis