Assessment of network module identification across complex diseases

Sarvenaz Choobdar(SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), Mehmet Eren Ahsen(Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai), Jake Crawford(Tufts University), Mattia Tomasoni(SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), Tao Fang(Roche (Switzerland)), David Lamparter(SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), Junyuan Lin(Tufts University), Benjamin Hescott(Northeastern University), Xiaozhe Hu(Tufts University), Johnathan Mercer(Broad Institute), Ted Natoli(Broad Institute), Rajiv Narayan(Broad Institute), Aravind Subramanian(Broad Institute), Jitao David Zhang(Roche (Switzerland)), Gustavo Stolovitzky(IBM Research - Thomas J. Watson Research Center), Zoltán Kutalik(SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), Kasper Lage(Broad Institute), Donna K. Slonim(Tufts University), Julio Sáez-Rodríguez(Heidelberg University), Lenore J. Cowen(Tufts University), Sven Bergmann(SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics), Daniel Marbach(Roche (Switzerland))
Nature Methods
August 30, 2019
Cited by 330Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Many bioinformatics methods have been proposed for reducing the complexity of large gene or protein networks into relevant subnetworks or modules. Yet, how such methods compare to each other in terms of their ability to identify disease-relevant modules in different types of network remains poorly understood. We launched the ‘Disease Module Identification DREAM Challenge’, an open competition to comprehensively assess module identification methods across diverse protein–protein interaction, signaling, gene co-expression, homology and cancer-gene networks. Predicted network modules were tested for association with complex traits and diseases using a unique collection of 180 genome-wide association studies. Our robust assessment of 75 module identification methods reveals top-performing algorithms, which recover complementary trait-associated modules. We find that most of these modules correspond to core disease-relevant pathways, which often comprise therapeutic targets. This community challenge establishes biologically interpretable benchmarks, tools and guidelines for molecular network analysis to study human disease biology. In this DREAM challenge, 75 methods for the identification of disease-relevant modules from molecular networks are compared and validated with GWAS data. The authors provide practical guidelines for users and establish benchmarks for network analysis.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis