Improving the evidence for indicator condition guided HIV testing in Europe: Results from the HIDES II Study – 2012 – 2015

Dorthe Raben(Rigshospitalet), Ann Sullivan(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), Amanda Mocroft(University College London), Galyna A Kutsyna(University of Luhansk), Vesna Hadžiosmanović(University of Sarajevo), Anna Vassilenko(Belarusian State Medical University), Nikoloz Chkhartisvili(AIDS and Clinical Immunology Research Center), В. М. Мицура(Gomel State Medical University), Court Pedersen(Odense University Hospital), Jane Anderson(Homerton University Hospital), Josip Begovać(University Hospital Centre Zagreb), Ulrik Bak Dragsted(Region Zealand), Barbara Bertisch(Kantonsspital St. Gallen), Anna Grzeszczuk(Medical University of Białystok), Jane Minton(St James's University Hospital), Valentina Coca Necsoi(Université Libre de Bruxelles), Maria Kitchen(University Hospital Innsbruck), Faïza Ajana(Centre Hospitalier de Tourcoing), Anton Sokhan(Kharkiv National Medical University), Laura Comi(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Paymaneh Farazmand(Huddersfield Royal Infirmary), Dragica Pešut(University of Belgrade), Stéphane De Wit(Université Libre de Bruxelles), José María Gatell(Hospital Clínic de Barcelona), Brian Gazzard(Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust), Antonella d’Arminio Monforte(Ospedale San Paolo), Jürgen K. Rockstroh(University of Bonn), Yazdan Yazdanpanah(Délégation Paris 7), Karen Champenois(Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard), Marie Louise Jakobsen(Rigshospitalet), Jens Lundgren(Rigshospitalet), on behalf of the HIDES Study Group
PLoS ONE
August 13, 2019
Cited by 67Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is cost-effective to perform an HIV test in people with specific indicator conditions (IC) with an undiagnosed HIV prevalence of at least 0.1%. Our aim was to determine the HIV prevalence for 14 different conditions across 20 European countries. METHODS: Individuals aged 18-65 years presenting for care with one of 14 ICs between January 2012 and June 2014 were included and routinely offered an HIV test. Logistic regression assessed factors associated with testing HIV positive. Patients presenting with infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome (IMS) were recruited up until September 2015. RESULTS: Of 10,877 patients presenting with an IC and included in the analysis, 303 tested positive (2.8%; 95% CI 2.5-3.1%). People presenting with an IC in Southern and Eastern Europe were more likely to test HIV positive as were people presenting with IMS, lymphadenopathy and leukocytopenia/ thrombocytopenia. One third of people diagnosed with HIV after presenting with IMS reported a negative HIV test in the preceding 12 months. Of patients newly diagnosed with HIV where data was available, 92.6% were promptly linked to care; of these 10.4% were reported lost to follow up or dead 12 months after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The study showed that 10 conditions had HIV prevalences > 0.1%. These 10 ICs should be adopted into HIV testing and IC specialty guidelines. As IMS presentation can mimic acute HIV sero-conversion and has the highest positivity rate, this IC in particular affords opportunities for earlier diagnosis and public health benefit.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis