Randomized phase III study (ADMYRE) of plitidepsin in combination with dexamethasone vs. dexamethasone alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Ivan Špıčka(Charles University), Enrique M. Ocio(Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla), Heather Oakervee(Barts Health NHS Trust), Richard Greil(Paracelsus Medical University), Raymond H. Banh(Mater Health Services), Shang‐Yi Huang(National Taiwan University Hospital), James M. D’Rozario(Canberra Hospital), Meletios Α. Dimopoulos(Alexandra Hospital), Sara Martínez(PharmaMar (Spain)), Sonia Extremera(PharmaMar (Spain)), Carmen Kahatt(PharmaMar (Spain)), Vicente Alfaro(PharmaMar (Spain)), Angelo Michele Carella(Ospedale Policlinico San Martino), Nathalie Meuleman(Institut Jules Bordet), Roman Hájek(University Hospital Ostrava), Argiris Symeonidis(University of Patras), Chang‐Ki Min(Seoul St. Mary's Hospital), Paul Cannell(Royal Perth Hospital), Heinz Ludwig(Wilhelminen Hospital), Pieter Sonneveld(Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), María‐Victoria Mateos(Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca)
Annals of Hematology
June 25, 2019
Cited by 57Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The randomized phase III ADMYRE trial evaluated plitidepsin plus dexamethasone (DXM) versus DXM alone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after at least three but not more than six prior regimens, including at least bortezomib and lenalidomide or thalidomide. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive plitidepsin 5 mg/m2 on D1 and D15 plus DXM 40 mg on D1, D8, D15, and D22 (arm A, n = 171) or DXM 40 mg on D1, D8, D15, and D22 (arm B, n = 84) q4wk. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Median PFS without disease progression (PD) confirmation (IRC assessment) was 2.6 months (arm A) and 1.7 months (arm B) (HR = 0.650; p = 0.0054). Median PFS with PD confirmation (investigator’s assessment) was 3.8 months (arm A) and 1.9 months (arm B) (HR = 0.611; p = 0.0040). Median overall survival (OS, intention-to-treat analysis) was 11.6 months (arm A) and 8.9 months (arm B) (HR = 0.797; p = 0.1261). OS improvement favoring arm A was found when discounting a crossover effect (37 patients crossed over from arm B to arm A) (two-stage method; HR = 0.622; p = 0.0015). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (% of patients arm A/arm B) were fatigue (10.8%/1.2%), myalgia (5.4%/0%), and nausea (3.6%/1.2%), being usually transient and reversible. The safety profile does not overlap with the toxicity observed with other agents used in multiple myeloma. In conclusion, efficacy data, the reassuring safety profile, and the novel mechanism of action of plitidepsin suggest that this combination can be an alternative option in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after at least three prior therapy lines.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis