Formal guidelines: management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

Laurent Papazian(Hôpital Nord), Cécile Aubron(Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest), Laurent Brochard(University of Toronto), Jean‐Daniel Chiche(Hôpital Cochin), Alain Combes(Sorbonne Université), Didier Dreyfuss(Université Paris Cité), Jean-Marie Forel(Hôpital Nord), Claude Guérin(Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse), Samir Jaber(Inserm), Armand Mekontso Dessap(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Alain Mercat(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers), Jean‐Christophe Richard(Laboratoire d’Imagerie Biomédicale), Damien Roux(Hôpital Louis-Mourier), Antoine Vieillard‐Baron(Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris), Henri Faure(Centre hospitalier Robert-Ballanger)
Annals of Intensive Care
January 1, 2019
Cited by 812Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Fifteen recommendations and a therapeutic algorithm regarding the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at the early phase in adults are proposed. The Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology has been followed. Four recommendations (low tidal volume, plateau pressure limitation, no oscillatory ventilation, and prone position) had a high level of proof (GRADE 1 + or 1 -); four (high positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] in moderate and severe ARDS, muscle relaxants, recruitment maneuvers, and venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation [ECMO]) a low level of proof (GRADE 2 + or 2 -); seven (surveillance, tidal volume for non ARDS mechanically ventilated patients, tidal volume limitation in the presence of low plateau pressure, PEEP > 5 cmH2O, high PEEP in the absence of deleterious effect, pressure mode allowing spontaneous ventilation after the acute phase, and nitric oxide) corresponded to a level of proof that did not allow use of the GRADE classification and were expert opinions. Lastly, for three aspects of ARDS management (driving pressure, early spontaneous ventilation, and extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal), the experts concluded that no sound recommendation was possible given current knowledge. The recommendations and the therapeutic algorithm were approved by the experts with strong agreement.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis