DeepCEST: 9.4 T Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI contrast predicted from 3 T data - a proof of concept study
Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Klaus Scheffler(University Hospital of Basel), Kai Herz(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Mark Schuppert(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Benjamin Bender(University of Tübingen), Ulrike Ernemann(University of Tübingen), Tobias Lindig(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), A Deshmane(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Philipp Ehses(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics)
Cited by 1
Related Papers
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance|2011|326
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR<i>Z</i>-spectroscopy<i>in vivo</i>: a review of theoretical approaches and methods
|Physics in Medicine and Biology|2013|320
Inverse <i>Z</i>‐spectrum analysis for spillover‐, MT‐, and <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>‐corrected steady‐state pulsed CEST‐MRI – application to pH‐weighted MRI of acute stroke
|NMR in Biomedicine|2014|311
Review and consensus recommendations on clinical <scp>APT</scp>‐weighted imaging approaches at <scp>3T</scp>: Application to brain tumors
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2022|236