Resumption of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy After Immune-Mediated Colitis

Hamzah Abu‐Sbeih(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Faisal S. Ali(Presence Saint Joseph Hospital), Abdul Rafeh Naqash(East Carolina University), Dwight H. Owen(The Ohio State University), Sandipkumar Patel(The Ohio State University), Gregory A. Otterson(The Ohio State University), Kari Kendra(The Ohio State University), Biagio Ricciuti(University of Perugia), Rita Chiari(University of Perugia), Andrea De Giglio(University of Perugia), Joseph Sleiman(Cleveland Clinic), Pauline Funchain(Cleveland Clinic), Wills Beatriz(Johns Hopkins University), Jiajia Zhang(Bloomberg (United States)), Jarushka Naidoo(Bloomberg (United States)), Jessica Philpott(Cleveland Clinic), Jianjun Gao(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Sumit K. Subudhi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Yinghong Wang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
June 4, 2019
Cited by 196Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy often is suspended because of immune-mediated diarrhea and colitis (IMDC). We examined the rate of and risk factors for IMDC recurrence after ICI resumption. METHODS This retrospective multicenter study examined patients who resumed ICI therapy after improvement of IMDC between January 2010 and November 2018. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses assessed the association of clinical covariates and IMDC recurrence. RESULTS Of the 167 patients in our analysis, 32 resumed an anti–cytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (CTLA-4) agent, and 135 an anti–programmed cell death 1 or ligand 1 (PD-1/L1) agent. The median age was 60 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50-69 years). The median duration from IMDC to restart of ICI treatment was 49 days (IQR, 23-136 days). IMDC recurred in 57 patients (34%) overall (44% of those receiving an anti–CTLA-4 and 32% of those receiving an anti–PD-1/L1); 47 of these patients (82%) required immunosuppressive therapy for recurrent IMDC, and all required permanent discontinuation of ICI therapy. The median duration from ICI resumption to IMDC recurrence was 53 days (IQR, 22-138 days). On multivariable logistic regression, patients who received anti–PD-1/L1 therapy at initial IMDC had a higher risk of IMDC recurrence (odds ratio [OR], 3.45; 95% CI, 1.59 to 7.69; P = .002). Risk of IMDC recurrence was higher for patients who required immunosuppression for initial IMDC (OR, 3.22; 95% CI, 1.08 to 9.62; P = .019) or had a longer duration of IMDC symptoms in the initial episode (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.03; P = .031). Risk of IMDC recurrence was lower after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 therapy than after resumption of anti–CTLA-4 therapy (OR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.81; P = .019). CONCLUSION One third of patients who resumed ICI treatment after IMDC experienced recurrent IMDC. Recurrence of IMDC was less frequent after resumption of anti–PD-1/L1 than after resumption of anti–CTLA-4.


Related Papers