Neoadjuvant nivolumab (N) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NI) for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Clinical and correlative results from the NEOSTAR study.

Tina Cascone(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), William Nassib William(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Annikka Weissferdt(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Heather Lin(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Cheuk Hong Leung(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Brett W. Carter(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Frank V. Fossella(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Frank E. Mott(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Vassiliki A. Papadimitrakopoulou(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), George R. Blumenschein(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Xiuning Le(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Lorenzo Federico(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Edwin R. Parra(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Chantale Bernatchez(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ignacio I. Wistuba(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Ara A. Vaporciyan(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Don L. Gibbons(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Stephen G. Swisher(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), John V. Heymach(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Boris Sepesi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), NEOSTAR Study Group
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2019
Cited by 144

Abstract

8504 Background: Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induce major pathologic response (MPR) rates of 20 to 45% in resected NSCLCs. We report the results of NEOSTAR - a phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant N or NI for NSCLCs. Methods: Pts with stage I-IIIA (single N2) resectable NSCLC (AJCC 7 th ), PS 0-1, were randomized to N (3 mg/kg IV, D1, 15, 29) or N plus I (1 mg/kg IV, D1) followed by surgery (n = 44). Primary endpoint: MPR (≤10% viable tumor), hypothesized to be higher than MPR to induction chemotherapy historical controls. Tumor immune infiltrates and pre- & post-ICI tumor PD-L1 % were assessed by flow cytometry & IHC. Wilcoxon ranked sum test & Fisher’s exact test were used for comparisons. Results: 44 pts were randomized, 23 N, 21 NI: mean age 66, 64% males, 18% never smokers, 59% adenocarcinomas, stages: IA 8 (18%), IB 15 (34%), IIA 7 (16%) IIB 5 (11%); IIIA 9 (20%). Only 3 pts received < 3 doses due to TRAEs (7%). 34 pts had surgery post ICIs (7 not resected [7/41], 17%, [2 N, 5 NI], 3 pending). There were 10 MPRs in 41 pts overall (24%, 4 N, 6 NI), of which 6 were path CRs (15%, 2 N [9%], 4 NI [21%]). Among 34 resected pts, MPR rate was 29% (N 20%, NI 43%). Median % of viable tumor was lower post NI vs N (20% vs 65%, p = .097). ORR (RECIST v1.1) was 22% (8 PRs [5 N, 3 NI], 1 CR [NI]); 15% of pts had PD (3 N, 3 NI). The proportion of CR+PR in MPR+ was higher than in MPR- (6 [60%] vs 2 [7%], p < .001). Surgical complications included 2 bronchopleural fistulas (BPFs) in N & 8 air leaks (5 N, 3 NI). G3-G5 TRAEs included a death due to BPF post steroid-treated pneumonitis (G5, N); G3 pneumonia, hypoxia, hypermagnesemia (1 each, all N), G3 diarrhea (1 NI). CD3 + & CD103 + tissue resident memory CD8 + TILs were higher in NI- vs N-treated tumors (CD3 + 81.2% vs 54.4%, p = .028; CD8 + 56.2% vs 38.3%, p = .069). Median pre-treatment tumor PD-L1 was higher in responders (MPR+, CR+PR) vs non-responders (80% vs 1%, p = .024), and the % of viable tumor was lower in tumors with PD-L1 > 1% vs PD-L1 ≤1% (median 20% vs 80%, p = .046). Conclusions: Overall a 24% MPR rate to neoadjuvant ICIs was observed. NI induced a higher % of non-viable tumor and of tissue resident memory TILs vs N. Antitumor activity was associated with higher pre-treatment PD-L1 levels. Clinical trial information: NCT03158129.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis