TAXOMET: A French prospective multicenter randomized controlled phase II study comparing docetaxel plus metformin versus docetaxel plus placebo in mCRPC.

Marc Pujalte‐Martin(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Delphine Borchiellini(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Julien Viotti(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Aline Guillot(Institute Cancer De La Loire Lucien Neuwirth), Jean Baptiste Paoli(Hôpital Saint Joseph), Dominique Besson, Werner Hilgers(Institut Sainte Catherine), Claude El Kouri(Hôpital privé du Confluent), Gérard Cavaglione(Centre Antoine Lacassagne), Frank Priou(Roche (France)), Tifenn L’Haridon(Roche (France)), Rémy Largillier(Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie), Jean‐Laurent Deville(Hôpital de la Timone), Benjamin Hoch(Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie), Renaud Schiappa(Université Côte d'Azur), Jean‐François Tanti(Inserm), Frédéric Bost(Inserm), Jean-­Marc Ferrero(Centre Antoine Lacassagne)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 20, 2019
Cited by 9

Abstract

5004 Background: Docetaxel (DOCE) is a standard of care in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Several retrospective cohort studies suggest a decrease in PC incidence and mortality with metformin (MET). MET has also demonstrated anti-tumor activity in PC preclinical models, with increase apoptosis when added to DOCE. The addition of MET could enhance DOCE efficacy in mCRPC patients (pts). Methods: TAXOMET is a phase II prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial. Non-diabetic mCRPC pts were assigned 1:1 to receive DOCE 75mg/m2 every 21 days + prednisone (P) 5 mg twice a day and either MET 850mg twice a day (arm A) or placebo (arm B), up to 10 cycles. The primary end point was PSA response rate (≥50% decrease). Main secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR, according to RECIST v1.1), clinical and biological progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity and quality of life (QoL). Comparisons between arm A and B were performed using Chi² test for qualitative data and Log-rank test for survival data. Results: From January 2013 to December 2015, 99 pts were randomized (50 pts in arm A and 49 pts in arm B) in 10 french centers, and 95 pts were evaluable. No difference was observed between arm A and arm B in PSA-response rate (72% in both arms), ORR (28% in both arms), clinical or biological mPFS (7.3 months vs 5.8 months p = 0.848) and mOS (24.2 months (95CI: 17.2 – 33.7) vs 19.7 months (95CI: 14.8 – 36.8), p = 0.53), respectively. There was no difference between arms in adverse events, except a trend for diarrhea to be more common with MET (70% in arm A vs 50% in arm B, p = 0.072), but few grade 3-4 events. There was no difference in QoL according to QLQ-C30 score between the two arms during the treatment period. Conclusions: This is the first prospective randomized controlled trial to evaluate the combination of MET with DOCE+P in mCRPC. The addition of MET has no meaningful clinical benefit in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT01796028.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis