Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastases (CYTO-CHIP study): A Propensity Score Analysis

Pierre‐Emmanuel Bonnot(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Guillaume Piessen(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille), Vahan Képénékian(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Évelyne Decullier, Marc Pocard(Hôpital Lariboisière), Bernard Meunier(Hôpital Pontchaillou), Jean-Marc Béréder(Hôpital l'Archet), K. Abboud(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne), Frédéric Marchal(Université de Lorraine), F. Quénet(CEA Valduc), Diane Goèré(Institut Gustave Roussy), Simon Msika(Hôpital Louis-Mourier), C. Arvieux(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble), N. Pirró(Hôpital de la Timone), Romuald Wernert(Institut Paul Bocuse), Patrick Rat, Johan Gagnière(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand), Jérémie H. Lefèvre(Sorbonne Université), Thomas Courvoisier(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers), Réza Kianmanesh(Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims), Delphine Vaudoyer(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Michel Rivoire(Centre Léon Bérard), Pierre Méeus(Centre Léon Bérard), Guillaume Passot(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), Olivier Gléhen(Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1), on behalf of the FREGAT and BIG-RENAPE Networks
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 14, 2019
Cited by 395

Abstract

PURPOSE Gastric cancer (GC) with peritoneal metastases (PMs) is a poor prognostic evolution. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) yields promising results, but the impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) remains controversial. Here we aimed to compare outcomes between CRS-HIPEC versus CRS alone (CRSa) among patients with PMs from GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS From prospective databases, we identified 277 patients with PMs from GC who were treated with complete CRS with curative intent (no residual nodules > 2.5 mm) at 19 French centers from 1989 to 2014. Of these patients, 180 underwent CRS-HIPEC and 97 CRSa. Tumor burden was assessed using the peritoneal cancer index. A Cox proportional hazards regression model with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on propensity score was used to assess the effect of HIPEC and account for confounding factors. RESULTS After IPTW adjustment, the groups were similar, except that median peritoneal cancer index remained higher in the CRS-HIPEC group (6 v 2; P = .003). CRS-HIPEC improved overall survival (OS) in both crude and IPTW models. Upon IPTW analysis, in CRS-HIPEC and CRSa groups, median OS was 18.8 versus 12.1 months, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 26.21% and 19.87% versus 10.82% and 6.43% (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.86; P = .005), and 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates were 20.40% and 17.05% versus 5.87% and 3.76% ( P = .001), respectively; the groups did not differ regarding 90-day mortality (7.4% v 10.1%, respectively; P = .820) or major complication rate (53.7% v 55.3%, respectively; P = .496). CONCLUSION Compared with CRSa, CRS-HIPEC improved OS and recurrence-free survival, without additional morbidity or mortality. When complete CRS is possible, CRS-HIPEC may be considered a valuable therapy for strictly selected patients with limited PMs from GC.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis