Effects of surgical targeting in laser interstitial thermal therapy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A multicenter study of 234 patients

Chengyuan Wu(Thomas Jefferson University), Walter J. Jermakowicz(University of Miami), Srijata Chakravorti(Vanderbilt University), Iahn Cajigas(University of Miami), Ashwini Sharan(Thomas Jefferson University), Jonathan Jagid(University of Miami), Caio M. Matias(Thomas Jefferson University), Michael R. Sperling(Thomas Jefferson University), Robert T. Buckley(University of Washington), Andrew L. Ko(University of Washington), Jeffrey G. Ojemann(University of Washington), John W. Miller(University of Washington), Brett E. Youngerman(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Sameer A. Sheth(Baylor College of Medicine), Guy M. McKhann(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Adrian W. Laxton(Neurological Surgery), Daniel E. Couture(Neurological Surgery), Gautam Popli(Wake Forest University), Alexander Smith(Hofstra University), Ashesh D. Mehta(Hofstra University), Allen L. Ho(Stanford Health Care), Casey H. Halpern(Stanford Health Care), Dario J. Englot(Vanderbilt University), Joseph S. Neimat(University of Louisville), Peter E. Konrad(Vanderbilt University), Elliot G. Neal(University of South Florida), Fernando Ĺ. Vale(University of South Florida), Kathryn L. Holloway(Virginia Commonwealth University), Ellen L. Air(Henry Ford Health System), Jason M. Schwalb(Henry Ford Health System), Benoît M. Dawant(Vanderbilt University), Pierre-François D’Haese(Vanderbilt University)
Epilepsia
May 21, 2019
Cited by 199Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) has reported seizure freedom rates between 36% and 78% with at least 1 year of follow-up. Unfortunately, the lack of robust methods capable of incorporating the inherent variability of patient anatomy, the variability of the ablated volumes, and clinical outcomes have limited three-dimensional quantitative analysis of surgical targeting and its impact on seizure outcomes. We therefore aimed to leverage a novel image-based methodology for normalizing surgical therapies across a large multicenter cohort to quantify the effects of surgical targeting on seizure outcomes in LITT for mTLE. METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 234 patients from 11 centers who underwent LITT for mTLE. To investigate therapy location, all ablation cavities were manually traced on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which were subsequently nonlinearly normalized to a common atlas space. The association of clinical variables and ablation location to seizure outcome was calculated using multivariate regression and Bayesian models, respectively. RESULTS: Ablations including more anterior, medial, and inferior temporal lobe structures, which involved greater amygdalar volume, were more likely to be associated with Engel class I outcomes. At both 1 and 2 years after LITT, 58.0% achieved Engel I outcomes. A history of bilateral tonic-clonic seizures decreased chances of Engel I outcome. Radiographic hippocampal sclerosis was not associated with seizure outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: LITT is a viable treatment for mTLE in patients who have been properly evaluated at a comprehensive epilepsy center. Consideration of surgical factors is imperative to the complete assessment of LITT. Based on our model, ablations must prioritize the amygdala and also include the hippocampal head, parahippocampal gyrus, and rhinal cortices to maximize chances of seizure freedom. Extending the ablation posteriorly has diminishing returns. Further work is necessary to refine this analysis and define the minimal zone of ablation necessary for seizure control.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis