Local Consolidative Therapy Vs. Maintenance Therapy or Observation for Patients With Oligometastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Long-Term Results of a Multi-Institutional, Phase II, Randomized Study

Daniel R. Gomez(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Chad Tang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Jianjun Zhang(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), George R. Blumenschein(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Mike Hernández(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), J. Jack Lee(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Rong Ye(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), David A. Palma(London Health Sciences Centre), Alexander V. Louie(London Health Sciences Centre), D. Ross Camidge(University of Colorado Denver), Robert C. Doebele(University of Colorado Denver), Ferdinandos Skoulidis(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Laurie E. Gaspar(University of Colorado Denver), James W. Welsh(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Don L. Gibbons(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), José A. Karam(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Brian D. Kavanagh(University of Colorado Denver), Anne S. Tsao(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Boris Sepesi(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Stephen G. Swisher(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), John V. Heymach(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
May 8, 2019
Cited by 1,259Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE Our previously published findings reported that local consolidative therapy (LCT) with radiotherapy or surgery improved progression-free survival (PFS) and delayed new disease in patients with oligometastatic non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy. Herein, we present the longer-term overall survival (OS) results accompanied by additional secondary end points. PATIENTS AND METHODS This multicenter, randomized, phase II trial enrolled patients with stage IV NSCLC, three or fewer metastases, and no progression at 3 or more months after front-line systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance therapy or observation (MT/O) or to LCT to all active disease sites. The primary end point was PFS; secondary end points were OS, toxicity, and the appearance of new lesions. All analyses were two sided, and P values less than .10 were deemed significant. RESULTS The Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommended early trial closure after 49 patients were randomly assigned because of a significant PFS benefit in the LCT arm. With an updated median follow-up time of 38.8 months (range, 28.3 to 61.4 months), the PFS benefit was durable (median, 14.2 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 23.1 months] with LCT v 4.4 months [95% CI, 2.2 to 8.3 months] with MT/O; P = .022). We also found an OS benefit in the LCT arm (median, 41.2 months [95% CI, 18.9 months to not reached] with LCT v 17.0 months [95% CI, 10.1 to 39.8 months] with MT/O; P = .017). No additional grade 3 or greater toxicities were observed. Survival after progression was longer in the LCT group (37.6 months with LCT v 9.4 months with MT/O; P = .034). Of the 20 patients who experienced progression in the MT/O arm, nine received LCT to all lesions after progression, and the median OS was 17 months (95% CI, 7.8 months to not reached). CONCLUSION In patients with oligometastatic NSCLC that did not progress after front-line systemic therapy, LCT prolonged PFS and OS relative to MT/O.


Related Papers