The Korean undiagnosed diseases program: lessons from a one-year pilot project

Soo Yeon Kim(Seoul National University Children's Hospital), Byung Chan Lim(Seoul National University Children's Hospital), Jin Sook Lee(Gachon University), Woo Joong Kim(Seoul National University Children's Hospital), Hyuna Kim(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Jung Min Ko(Seoul National University Hospital), Ki Joong Kim(Seoul National University Children's Hospital), Sun Ah Choi(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Hunmin Kim(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Hee Hwang(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Jieun Choi(SNUH SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center), Anna Cho(Ewha Womans University), Jangsup Moon(Seoul National University Hospital), Moon‐Woo Seong(Seoul National University Hospital), Sung Sup Park(Seoul National University Hospital), Yun Jeong Lee(Kyungpook National University Hospital), Young Ok Kim(Chonnam National University Hospital), Jon Soo Kim(Chungbuk National University), Won Seop Kim(Chungbuk National University), Young Se Kwon(Inha University), June Dong Park(Seoul National University), Younjhin Ahn(Korea National Institute of Health), Joo‐Yeon Hwang(Korea National Institute of Health), Hyun‐Young Park(Korea National Institute of Health), Youngha Lee(Kyungpook National University Hospital), Murim Choi(Seoul National University Children's Hospital), Jong‐Hee Chae(Seoul National University Children's Hospital)
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
March 20, 2019
Cited by 33Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Korean Undiagnosed Diseases Program (KUDP) was launched in January 2017 as a one-year pilot project to address the increasing global interest in patients with undiagnosed rare diseases. The purpose of this paper is to summarize the project results and emphasize the unmet research needs among patients with undiagnosed rare diseases in Korea. RESULTS: Patient enrollment, assessment, and diagnostic processes were determined by the KUDP clinical expert consortium. Patients followed a diagnostic workflow after being categorized into one of four groups: I) insufficient clinical information or lack of standard diagnostic processes; II) undiagnosed due to low disease awareness; III) clinically diagnosed but unconfirmed genetically due to genetic heterogeneities; or IV) unknown disease due to complex, atypical clinical presentations. After excluding two patients from group I, 97 patients were enrolled, including 10 in group II, 67 in group III, and 20 in group IV. Most of them (92 of 97, 94.8%) were pediatric patients (< 18 years old) and 59 (60.8%) were male. The primary symptoms for 80 patients (82.5%) were neurologic. During the one-year pilot study, 72 patients completed a diagnostic assessment including clinical and molecular genetic analyses; some patients also underwent pathological or biochemical analysis. Twenty-eight of these patients (28/72, 38.9%) achieved molecular genetic diagnosis. Thirteen patients were diagnosed based on traditional tests, including biochemical assay, single or targeted genetic analysis, and chromosomal microarray. We performed whole exome sequencing on 52 patients, among whom 15 (28.8%, 15/52) reached a final diagnosis. One new disorder was identified via international collaboration. CONCLUSIONS: Using an efficient clinical diagnostic workflow, this KUDP pilot study resulted in a fair diagnostic success rate, improving the potential for additional diagnoses and new scientific discovery of complex and rare diseases. KUDP also satisfied unmet needs for rare diseases with multisystem involvement, highlighting the value of emerging genomic technologies for further research into rare and still-undiagnosed conditions.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis