Patient Blood Management

Markus M. Mueller(Goethe University Frankfurt), Hans Van Remoortel(Rode Kruis-Vlaanderen), Patrick Meybohm(Goethe University Frankfurt), Kari Aranko, Cécile Aubron(Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest), Reinhard Bürger(Robert Koch Institute), Jeffrey L. Carson(Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey), Klaus Cichutek(Paul Ehrlich Institut), Emmy De Buck(KU Leuven), Dana V. Devine(Canadian Blood Services), Dean Fergusson(University of Ottawa), Gilles Folléa, Craig French(Western Health), Kathrine P. Frey(Fairview Health Services), Richard R. Gammon(OneBlood), Jerrold H. Levy(Duke Medical Center), Michael Murphy(University of Oxford), Yves Ozier(Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest), Katerina Pavenski(University of Toronto), Cynthia So‐Osman(Dutch Blood Transfusion Society), Pierre Tiberghien(Établissement Français du Sang), Jimmy Volmink(Stellenbosch University), Jonathan H. Waters(University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), Erica M. Wood(Dutch Blood Transfusion Society), Erhard Seifried(Goethe University Frankfurt), for the ICC PBM Frankfurt 2018 Group
JAMA
March 12, 2019
Cited by 615

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Blood transfusion is one of the most frequently used therapies worldwide and is associated with benefits, risks, and costs. OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of evidence-based recommendations for patient blood management (PBM) and for research. EVIDENCE REVIEW: The scientific committee developed 17 Population/Intervention/Comparison/Outcome (PICO) questions for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in adult patients in 3 areas: preoperative anemia (3 questions), RBC transfusion thresholds (11 questions), and implementation of PBM programs (3 questions). These questions guided the literature search in 4 biomedical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Transfusion Evidence Library), searched from inception to January 2018. Meta-analyses were conducted with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and the Evidence-to-Decision framework by 3 panels including clinical and scientific experts, nurses, patient representatives, and methodologists, to develop clinical recommendations during a consensus conference in Frankfurt/Main, Germany, in April 2018. FINDINGS: From 17 607 literature citations associated with the 17 PICO questions, 145 studies, including 63 randomized clinical trials with 23 143 patients and 82 observational studies with more than 4 million patients, were analyzed. For preoperative anemia, 4 clinical and 3 research recommendations were developed, including the strong recommendation to detect and manage anemia sufficiently early before major elective surgery. For RBC transfusion thresholds, 4 clinical and 6 research recommendations were developed, including 2 strong clinical recommendations for critically ill but clinically stable intensive care patients with or without septic shock (recommended threshold for RBC transfusion, hemoglobin concentration <7 g/dL) as well as for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (recommended threshold for RBC transfusion, hemoglobin concentration <7.5 g/dL). For implementation of PBM programs, 2 clinical and 3 research recommendations were developed, including recommendations to implement comprehensive PBM programs and to use electronic decision support systems (both conditional recommendations) to improve appropriate RBC utilization. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The 2018 PBM International Consensus Conference defined the current status of the PBM evidence base for practice and research purposes and established 10 clinical recommendations and 12 research recommendations for preoperative anemia, RBC transfusion thresholds for adults, and implementation of PBM programs. The relative paucity of strong evidence to answer many of the PICO questions supports the need for additional research and an international consensus for accepted definitions and hemoglobin thresholds, as well as clinically meaningful end points for multicenter trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis