Rivaroxaban for Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Ambulatory Patients with Cancer

Alok A. Khorana(Cleveland Clinic), Gerald A. Soff(Cornell University), Ajay K. Kakkar(University College London), Saroj Vadhan‐Raj(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Hanno Riess(Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin), Ted Wun(University of California, Davis), Michael B. Streiff(Johns Hopkins Medicine), David García(University of Washington), Howard A. Liebman(University of Southern California), Chandra P. Belani(Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center), Eileen M. O’Reilly(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Jai N. Patel(Levine Cancer Institute), Habte Yimer(Texas Oncology), Peter Wildgoose(Janssen (United States)), Paul Burton(Janssen (United States)), Ujjwala Vijapurkar(Janssen (United States)), Simrati Kaul(Janssen (United States)), John W. Eikelboom(McMaster University), Robert D. McBane(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Kenneth A. Bauer(Hadassah Medical Center), Nicole M. Kuderer(University of Washington), Gary H. Lyman(Cancer Research Center)
New England Journal of Medicine
February 20, 2019
Cited by 709Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory patients receiving systemic cancer therapy are at varying risk for venous thromboembolism. However, the benefit of thromboprophylaxis in these patients is uncertain. METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized trial involving high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer (Khorana score of ≥2, on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a higher risk of venous thromboembolism), we randomly assigned patients without deep-vein thrombosis at screening to receive rivaroxaban (at a dose of 10 mg) or placebo daily for up to 180 days, with screening every 8 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of objectively confirmed proximal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, pulmonary embolism, symptomatic deep-vein thrombosis in an upper limb or distal deep-vein thrombosis in a lower limb, and death from venous thromboembolism and was assessed up to day 180. In a prespecified supportive analysis involving the same population, the same end point was assessed during the intervention period (first receipt of trial agent to last dose plus 2 days). The primary safety end point was major bleeding. RESULTS: Of 1080 enrolled patients, 49 (4.5%) had thrombosis at screening and did not undergo randomization. Of the 841 patients who underwent randomization, the primary end point occurred in 25 of 420 patients (6.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 37 of 421 (8.8%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40 to 1.09; P = 0.10) in the period up to day 180. In the prespecified intervention-period analysis, the primary end point occurred in 11 patients (2.6%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 27 (6.4%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.80). Major bleeding occurred in 8 of 405 patients (2.0%) in the rivaroxaban group and in 4 of 404 (1.0%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.96; 95% CI, 0.59 to 6.49). CONCLUSIONS: In high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer, treatment with rivaroxaban did not result in a significantly lower incidence of venous thromboembolism or death due to venous thromboembolism in the 180-day trial period. During the intervention period, rivaroxaban led to a substantially lower incidence of such events, with a low incidence of major bleeding. (Funded by Janssen and others; CASSINI ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02555878.).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis