A multicenter real‐world review of 10 <scp>kH</scp>z <scp>SCS</scp> outcomes for treatment of chronic trunk and/or limb pain
Thomas Stauss, Mohammad Maarouf(University of Cologne), Faycal El Majdoub(Witten/Herdecke University), Martin Bettag(Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier), Gernot Surges(Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Trier), Bradford E. Gliner(Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist), Deborah Edgar(Powerscreen (United Kingdom)), Abdul Ghaaliq Lalkhen(University of Salford), Leonardo Kapural(Novem (Netherlands)), Anand Rotte(CardioDx (United States)), Jeyakumar Subbaroyan(Nevro (United States)), William S. Rosenberg(Pain Relief Foundation), Richard Bundschu(Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist), Nileshkumar Patel(Carolinas Center for Advanced Management of Pain), Dawood Sayed(University of Kansas Medical Center)
Cited by 76
Related Papers
Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain
|Anesthesiology|2015|838
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain
|Neurosurgery|2016|463
Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial of 150-J Biphasic Shocks Compared With 200- to 360-J Monophasic Shocks in the Resuscitation of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Victims
|Circulation|2000|333
Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy
|JAMA Neurology|2021|264
Coordinated reset neuromodulation for Parkinson's disease: Proof‐of‐concept study
|Movement Disorders|2014|217