Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia

Jeff D. Williamson(Wake Forest University), Nicholas M. Pajewski(Wake Forest University), Alexander P. Auchus(Jackson Memorial Hospital), R. Nick Bryan(University of Pennsylvania), Gordon J. Chelune(University of Utah), Alfred K. Cheung(University of Utah), Maryjo Cleveland(Wake Forest University), Laura H. Coker(Wake Forest University), Michael Crowe(University of Alabama at Birmingham), William C. Cushman, Jeffrey A. Cutler(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Christos Davatzikos(University of Pennsylvania), Lisa Desiderio(University of Pennsylvania), Guray Erus(University of Pennsylvania), Larry J. Fine(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Sarah A. Gaussoin(Wake Forest University), Darrin Harris(Wake Forest University), M. Ani Hsieh(University of Pennsylvania), Karen Johnson(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Paul L. Kimmel(National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases), Manjula Kurella Tamura(Stanford University), Lenore J. Launer(National Institute on Aging), Alan J. Lerner(Case Western Reserve University), Cora E. Lewis(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Jennifer Martindale‐Adams(University of Tennessee Health Science Center), Claudia S. Moy(National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke), Ilya M. Nasrallah(University of Pennsylvania), Linda O. Nichols, Suzanne Oparil(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Paula Ogrocki(University School), Mahboob Rahman(Case Western Reserve University), Stephen R. Rapp(Wake Forest University), David M. Reboussin(Wake Forest University), Michael V. Rocco(Wake Forest University), Bonnie C. Sachs(Wake Forest University), Kaycee M. Sink(Wake Forest University), Carolyn H. Still(Case Western Reserve University), Mark A. Supiano(University of Utah), Joni K. Snyder(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Virginia G. Wadley(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Jennifer Walker(Wake Forest University), Daniel E. Weiner(Tufts Medical Center), Paul K. Whelton(Tulane University), Valerie M. Wilson(Wake Forest University), Nancy Woolard(Wake Forest University), Jackson T. Wright(Case Western Reserve University), Clinton B. Wright(National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke)
JAMA
January 28, 2019
Cited by 1,191Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Importance: There are currently no proven treatments to reduce the risk of mild cognitive impairment and dementia. Objective: To evaluate the effect of intensive blood pressure control on risk of dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted at 102 sites in the United States and Puerto Rico among adults aged 50 years or older with hypertension but without diabetes or history of stroke. Randomization began on November 8, 2010. The trial was stopped early for benefit on its primary outcome (a composite of cardiovascular events) and all-cause mortality on August 20, 2015. The final date for follow-up of cognitive outcomes was July 22, 2018. Interventions: Participants were randomized to a systolic blood pressure goal of either less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment group; n = 4678) or less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment group; n = 4683). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary cognitive outcome was occurrence of adjudicated probable dementia. Secondary cognitive outcomes included adjudicated mild cognitive impairment and a composite outcome of mild cognitive impairment or probable dementia. Results: Among 9361 randomized participants (mean age, 67.9 years; 3332 women [35.6%]), 8563 (91.5%) completed at least 1 follow-up cognitive assessment. The median intervention period was 3.34 years. During a total median follow-up of 5.11 years, adjudicated probable dementia occurred in 149 participants in the intensive treatment group vs 176 in the standard treatment group (7.2 vs 8.6 cases per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio [HR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.67-1.04). Intensive BP control significantly reduced the risk of mild cognitive impairment (14.6 vs 18.3 cases per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95) and the combined rate of mild cognitive impairment or probable dementia (20.2 vs 24.1 cases per 1000 person-years; HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: Among ambulatory adults with hypertension, treating to a systolic blood pressure goal of less than 120 mm Hg compared with a goal of less than 140 mm Hg did not result in a significant reduction in the risk of probable dementia. Because of early study termination and fewer than expected cases of dementia, the study may have been underpowered for this end point. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis