Comparison of Paresthesia Coverage of Patient’s Pain: Dorsal Root Ganglion vs. Spinal Cord Stimulation. An ACCURATE Study Sub-Analysis

Timothy R. Deer(The Spine & Nerve Centers of the Virginias), Nagy Mekhail(Cleveland Clinic), Eric Grigsby(School of the Art Institute of Chicago), Stan Golovac(Florida Pain Institute), James Scowcroft(Pain Management Institute), Filippo Agnesi(University of Minnesota), Richard Paicius, Jeffery Kramer(Volunteers of America Alaska), Michael K. Schaufele(Drug Studies America), W. Porter McRoberts(Holy Cross Hospital), Kasra Amirdelfan(Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist), Leonardo Kapural(Novem (Netherlands)), Abram H. Burgher(Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist), Peter S. Staats(Johns Hopkins University), Robert M. Levy(Hematology Oncology Consultants), Allen W. Burton(Abbott (United States)), Jason E. Pope(Evolve Restorative Center), Adil Raza(Abbott (United States)), Sam Samuel(Cleveland Clinic), Lawrence Poree(University of California, San Francisco)
Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface
January 9, 2019
10.1111/ner.12920
Cited by 50

Related Papers

Novel 10-kHz High-frequency Therapy (HF10 Therapy) Is Superior to Traditional Low-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain
|Anesthesiology|2015|838
Dorsal root ganglion stimulation yielded higher treatment success rate for complex regional pain syndrome and causalgia at 3 and 12 months: a randomized comparative trial
|Pain|2016|614
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 4th Edition
|Pain Medicine|2013|533
Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency and Traditional Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Back and Leg Pain
|Neurosurgery|2016|463
Success Using Neuromodulation With BURST (SUNBURST) Study: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial Using a Novel Burst Waveform
|Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface|2017|451