Assessment of Platelet REACtivity After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Víctor Alfonso Jiménez Díaz(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Antonio Tello‐Montoliu(Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares), Raúl Moreno(Hospital Universitario La Paz), Ignacio Cruz‐González(Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares), José Antonio Baz Alonso(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Rafael Romaguera(Bellvitge University Hospital), Eduardo Molina Navarro(Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves), Pablo Juan‐Salvadores(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Emilio Paredes-Galán(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Antonio De Miguel Castro(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Guillermo Bastos Fernández(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Alberto Ortiz Sáez(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Saleta Fernández Barbeira(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Sergio Raposeiras‐Roubín(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Juan Ocampo Míguez(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Antonio Serra Peñaranda(Hospital de Sant Pau), Mariano Valdés Chávarri(Centro de Investigación en Red en Enfermedades Cardiovasculares), Ángel Cequier(Bellvitge University Hospital), Francisco Calvo(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo), Andrés Íñiguez(University Hospital Complex Of Vigo)
JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
January 1, 2019
Cited by 61Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The REAC-TAVI (Assessment of platelet REACtivity after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation) trial enrolled patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) pre-treated with aspirin + clopidogrel, aimed to compare the efficacy of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in suppressing high platelet reactivity (HPR) after TAVI. BACKGROUND: Current recommendations support short-term use of aspirin + clopidogrel for patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR despite the lack of compelling evidence. METHODS: reaction units (PRU) ≥208. Patients with HPR before TAVR were randomized to either aspirin + ticagrelor or aspirin + clopidogrel for 3 months. Patients without HPR continued with aspirin + clopidogrel (registry cohort). The primary endpoint was non-HPR status (PRU <208) in ≥70% of patients treated with ticagrelor at 90 days post-TAVR. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included. Of these, 48 (71%) had HPR (PRU 273 ± 09) and were randomized to aspirin + ticagrelor (n = 24, PRU 277 ± 08) or continued with aspirin + clopidogrel (n = 24, PRU 269 ± 49). The remaining 20 patients (29%) without HPR (PRU 133 ± 12) were included in the registry. Overall, platelet reactivity across all the study time points after TAVR was lower in patients randomized to ticagrelor compared with those treated with clopidogrel, including those enrolled in the registry (p < 0.001). The primary endpoint was achieved in 100% of patients with ticagrelor compared with 21% with clopidogrel (p < 0.001). Interestingly, 33% of clopidogrel responder patients at baseline developed HPR status during the first month after TAVR. CONCLUSIONS: HPR to clopidogrel is present in a considerable number of patients with AS undergoing TAVR. Ticagrelor achieves a better and faster effect, providing sustained suppression of HPR to these patients. (Platelet Reactivity After TAVI: A Multicenter Pilot Study [REAC-TAVI]; NCT02224066).


Related Papers