Tremelimumab in Combination With Microwave Ablation in Patients With Refractory Biliary Tract Cancer

Changqing Xie(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Austin G. Duffy(National Institutes of Health), Donna Mabry‐Hrones(National Cancer Institute), Bradford J. Wood(Center for Cancer Research), Elliot Levy(Center for Cancer Research), Venkatesh Krishnasamy(Center for Cancer Research), Javed Khan(Center for Cancer Research), Jun S. Wei(Center for Cancer Research), David Agdashian(National Cancer Institute), Manoj Tyagi(Center for Cancer Research), Vineela Gangalapudi(Center for Cancer Research), Suzanne Fioravanti(National Cancer Institute), Melissa Walker(National Institutes of Health), Victoria Anderson(Center for Cancer Research), David Venzon(Data Management (Italy)), William D. Figg(National Institutes of Health), Milan Sandhu(National Cancer Institute), David E. Kleiner(National Institutes of Health), Maria Pia Morelli(National Cancer Institute), Charalampos S. Floudas(National Heart Lung and Blood Institute), Gagandeep Brar(National Institutes of Health), Seth M. Steinberg(Center for Cancer Research), Firouzeh Korangy(Center for Cancer Research), Tim F. Greten(Cancer Institute (WIA))
Hepatology
December 22, 2018
Cited by 100Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Treatment options for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer are limited. Dysregulation of the immune system plays an important role in the pathogenesis of biliary tract cancer (BTC). This study aimed to investigate whether tremelimumab, an anti‐CTLA4 (cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte–associated protein 4) inhibitor, could be combined safely with microwave ablation to enhance the effect of anti‐CTLA4 treatment in patients with advanced BTC. Patients were enrolled to receive monthly tremelimumab (10 mg/kg, intravenously) for six doses, followed by infusions every 3 months until off‐treatment criteria were met. Thirty‐six days after the first tremelimumab dose, patients underwent subtotal microwave ablation. Interval imaging studies were performed every 8 weeks. Adverse events (AEs) were noted and managed. Tumor and peripheral blood samples were collected to perform immune monitoring and whole‐exome sequencing (WES). Twenty patients with refractory BTC were enrolled (median age, 56.5 years). No dose‐limiting toxicities were encountered. The common treatment‐related AEs included lymphopenia, diarrhea, and elevated transaminases. Among 16 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis, 2 (12.5%) patients achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting for 8.0 and 18.1 months, respectively) and 5 patients (31.3%) achieved stable disease. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5‐5.2) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.8‐8.8), respectively. Peripheral blood immune cell subset profiling showed increased circulating activated human leukocyte antigen, DR isotype ([HLA‐DR] positive) CD8+ T cells. T‐cell receptor (TCR)β screening showed tremelimumab expanded TCR repertoire, but not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.057). Conclusion: Tremelimumab in combination with tumor ablation is a potential treatment strategy for patients with advanced BTC. Increased circulating activated CD8+ T cells and TCR repertoire expansion induced by tremelimumab may contribute to treatment benefit.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis