Comparison of Immediate vs Deferred Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Patients With Synchronous Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Receiving Sunitinib

Axel Bex(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Peter F.A. Mulders(Radboud University Nijmegen), Michael A.S. Jewett(Princess Margaret Cancer Centre), John Wagstaff(University Hospital of Wales), Johannes V. van Thienen(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Christian U. Blank(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Roland van Velthoven(Institut Jules Bordet), Maria del Pilar Laguna(Istanbul Medipol University), Lori Wood(Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre), Harm H.E. van Melick(St. Antonius Ziekenhuis), Maureen J.B. Aarts(Maastricht University), Jean-Baptiste Lattouf(Université de Montréal), Thomas Powles(University College London), Igle J. de Jong(University of Groningen), Sylvie Rottey(Ghent University Hospital), Bertrand Tombal(Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc), Sandrine Marréaud(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), Sandra Collette(Bristol-Myers Squibb (Belgium)), Laurence Collette(European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer), John B.A.G. Haanen(The Netherlands Cancer Institute)
JAMA Oncology
December 13, 2018
Cited by 487Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Importance: In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown. Objective: To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied. Interventions: Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points. Results: The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%). Conclusions and Relevance: Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis