Optimized libraries for CRISPR-Cas9 genetic screens with multiple modalities

Kendall R Sanson(Broad Institute), Ruth E. Hanna(Broad Institute), Mudra Hegde(Broad Institute), Katherine Donovan(Broad Institute), Christine Strand(Broad Institute), Meagan E. Sullender(Broad Institute), Emma W Vaimberg(Broad Institute), Amy Goodale(Broad Institute), David E. Root(Broad Institute), Federica Piccioni(Broad Institute), John G. Doench(Broad Institute)
Nature Communications
December 17, 2018
Cited by 1,121Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

The creation of genome-wide libraries for CRISPR knockout (CRISPRko), interference (CRISPRi), and activation (CRISPRa) has enabled the systematic interrogation of gene function. Here, we show that our recently-described CRISPRko library (Brunello) is more effective than previously published libraries at distinguishing essential and non-essential genes, providing approximately the same perturbation-level performance improvement over GeCKO libraries as GeCKO provided over RNAi. Additionally, we present genome-wide libraries for CRISPRi (Dolcetto) and CRISPRa (Calabrese), and show in negative selection screens that Dolcetto, with fewer sgRNAs per gene, outperforms existing CRISPRi libraries and achieves comparable performance to CRISPRko in detecting essential genes. We also perform positive selection CRISPRa screens and demonstrate that Calabrese outperforms the SAM approach at identifying vemurafenib resistance genes. We further compare CRISPRa to genome-scale libraries of open reading frames (ORFs). Together, these libraries represent a suite of genome-wide tools to efficiently interrogate gene function with multiple modalities.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis