Molecular High-Grade B-Cell Lymphoma: Defining a Poor-Risk Group That Requires Different Approaches to Therapy

Chulin Sha(University of Leeds), Sharon Barrans(St James's University Hospital), Francesco Cucco(University of Cambridge), Michael A. Bentley(University of Leeds), Matthew A. Care(University of Leeds), Thomas Cummin(Cancer Research UK), Hannah Kennedy(University of Cambridge), Joe Sneath Thompson(University of Cambridge), Rahman Uddin(University of Leeds), Lisa Worrillow(St James's University Hospital), Rebecca Chalkley(St James's University Hospital), Moniek van Hoppe(St James's University Hospital), Sophia Ahmed(University of Leeds), Tom Maishman(Cancer Research UK), Josh Caddy(Cancer Research UK), Anna Schuh(University of Oxford), Christoph Mamot(Kantonsspital Aarau), Catherine Burton(St James's University Hospital), Reuben Tooze(University of Leeds), Andrew Davies(Cancer Research UK), Ming‐Qing Du(University of Cambridge), Peter Johnson(Cancer Research UK), David R. Westhead(University of Leeds)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
December 6, 2018
Cited by 299Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

PURPOSE: Biologic heterogeneity is a feature of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and the existence of a subgroup with poor prognosis and phenotypic proximity to Burkitt lymphoma is well known. Conventional cytogenetics identifies some patients with rearrangements of MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 (double-hit lymphomas) who are increasingly treated with more intensive chemotherapy, but a more biologically coherent and clinically useful definition of this group is required. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We defined a molecular high-grade (MHG) group by applying a gene expression-based classifier to 928 patients with DLBCL from a clinical trial that investigated the addition of bortezomib to standard rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy. The prognostic significance of MHG was compared with existing biomarkers. We performed targeted sequencing of 70 genes in 400 patients and explored molecular pathology using gene expression signature databases. Findings were validated in an independent data set. RESULTS: The MHG group comprised 83 patients (9%), with 75 in the cell-of-origin germinal center B-cell-like group. MYC rearranged and double-hit groups were strongly over-represented in MHG but comprised only one half of the total. Gene expression analysis revealed a proliferative phenotype with a relationship to centroblasts. Progression-free survival rate at 36 months after R-CHOP in the MHG group was 37% (95% CI, 24% to 55%) compared with 72% (95% CI, 68% to 77%) for others, and an analysis of treatment effects suggested a possible positive effect of bortezomib. Double-hit lymphomas lacking the MHG signature showed no evidence of worse outcome than other germinal center B-cell-like cases. CONCLUSION: MHG defines a biologically coherent high-grade B-cell lymphoma group with distinct molecular features and clinical outcomes that effectively doubles the size of the poor-prognosis, double-hit group. Patients with MHG may benefit from intensified chemotherapy or novel targeted therapies.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis