2018 American College of Rheumatology/National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis

Jasvinder A. Singh(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Gordon Guyatt(McMaster University), Alexis Ogdie(University of Pennsylvania), Dafna D. Gladman(University of Toronto), Chad Deal(Cleveland Clinic), Atul Deodhar(Oregon Health & Science University), Maureen Dubreuil(Boston Medical Center), Jonathan Dunham(University of Pennsylvania), M. Elaine Husni(Cleveland Clinic), Sarah Kenny(New York Proton Center), Jennifer Kwan‐Morley(Premier Research Group), Janice Lin(Stanford University), Paula Marchetta(Concordia College - New York), Philip J. Mease(Providence College), Joseph F. Merola(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Julie Miner(Compass Technology Group (United States)), Christopher T. Ritchlin(University of Rochester Medical Center), Bernadette C. Siaton(University of Maryland, Baltimore), Benjamin J. Smith(Florida State University), Abby S. Van Voorhees(Eastern Virginia Medical School), A. Helena Jonsson(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Amit Shah(American College of Rheumatology), Nancy Sullivan(ECRI Institute), Marat Turgunbaev(American College of Rheumatology), Laura C. Coates(University of Oxford), Alice B. Gottlieb(New York Medical College), Marina Magrey(MetroHealth), W. Benjamin Nowell(Global Healthy Living Foundation), Ana‐Maria Orbai(Johns Hopkins University), Soumya M. Reddy(New York University), José U. Scher(New York University), Evan Siegel(Arthritis and Rheumatism Associates), Michael Siegel(National Psoriasis Foundation), Jessica A. Walsh(University of Utah), Amy S. Turner(American College of Rheumatology), James Reston(ECRI Institute)
Arthritis & Rheumatology
November 30, 2018
Cited by 479Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop an evidence-based guideline for the pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as a collaboration between the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF). METHODS: We identified critical outcomes in PsA and clinically relevant PICO (population/intervention/comparator/outcomes) questions. A Literature Review Team performed a systematic literature review to summarize evidence supporting the benefits and harms of available pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies for PsA. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) methodology was used to rate the quality of the evidence. A voting panel, including rheumatologists, dermatologists, other health professionals, and patients, achieved consensus on the direction and the strength of the recommendations. RESULTS: The guideline covers the management of active PsA in patients who are treatment-naive and those who continue to have active PsA despite treatment, and addresses the use of oral small molecules, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, interleukin-12/23 inhibitors (IL-12/23i), IL-17 inhibitors, CTLA4-Ig (abatacept), and a JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib). We also developed recommendations for psoriatic spondylitis, predominant enthesitis, and treatment in the presence of concomitant inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, or serious infections. We formulated recommendations for a treat-to-target strategy, vaccinations, and nonpharmacologic therapies. Six percent of the recommendations were strong and 94% conditional, indicating the importance of active discussion between the health care provider and the patient to choose the optimal treatment. CONCLUSION: The 2018 ACR/NPF PsA guideline serves as a tool for health care providers and patients in the selection of appropriate therapy in common clinical scenarios. Best treatment decisions consider each individual patient situation. The guideline is not meant to be proscriptive and should not be used to limit treatment options for patients with PsA.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis