Possible artifacts in dynamic CEST MRI due to motion and field alterations
Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Klaus Scheffler(University Hospital of Basel), Kai Herz(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Benjamin Bender(University of Tübingen), Ulrike Ernemann(University of Tübingen), A Deshmane(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Tobias Lindig(University Children's Hospital Tübingen), Mina Kim(University College London), Xavier Golay(Gold Standard Simulations (United Kingdom))
Cited by 56
Related Papers
Recommended implementation of arterial spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2014|2.2k
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
Amide proton transfer imaging of human brain tumors at 3T
|Magnetic Resonance in Medicine|2006|341
Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance|2011|326