Dapagliflozin and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes

Stephen D. Wiviott(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Itamar Raz(Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Marc P. Bonaca(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Ofri Mosenzon(Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Eri Kato(Kyoto University), Avivit Cahn(Hebrew University of Jerusalem), Michael G. Silverman(Massachusetts General Hospital), Thomas A. Zelniker(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Julia Kuder(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Sabina A. Murphy(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Deepak L. Bhatt(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Lawrence A. Leiter(St. Michael's Hospital), Darren K. McGuire(Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group), John Wilding(University of Liverpool), Christian T. Ruff(Brigham and Women's Hospital), Ingrid Gause‐Nilsson(Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Study Group), Martin Fredriksson(AstraZeneca (Sweden)), Peter A. Johansson(AstraZeneca (Sweden)), Anna-Maria Langkilde(AstraZeneca (Sweden)), Marc S. Sabatine(Brigham and Women's Hospital)
New England Journal of Medicine
November 10, 2018
Cited by 6,259Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The cardiovascular safety profile of dapagliflozin, a selective inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 that promotes glucosuria in patients with type 2 diabetes, is undefined. METHODS: of body-surface area, new end-stage renal disease, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes) and death from any cause. RESULTS: We evaluated 17,160 patients, including 10,186 without atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, who were followed for a median of 4.2 years. In the primary safety outcome analysis, dapagliflozin met the prespecified criterion for noninferiority to placebo with respect to MACE (upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval [CI], <1.3; P<0.001 for noninferiority). In the two primary efficacy analyses, dapagliflozin did not result in a lower rate of MACE (8.8% in the dapagliflozin group and 9.4% in the placebo group; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.03; P=0.17) but did result in a lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure (4.9% vs. 5.8%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.95; P=0.005), which reflected a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.88); there was no between-group difference in cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.17). A renal event occurred in 4.3% in the dapagliflozin group and in 5.6% in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.87), and death from any cause occurred in 6.2% and 6.6%, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.04). Diabetic ketoacidosis was more common with dapagliflozin than with placebo (0.3% vs. 0.1%, P=0.02), as was the rate of genital infections that led to discontinuation of the regimen or that were considered to be serious adverse events (0.9% vs. 0.1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, treatment with dapagliflozin did not result in a higher or lower rate of MACE than placebo but did result in a lower rate of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, a finding that reflects a lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure. (Funded by AstraZeneca; DECLARE-TIMI 58 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01730534 .).


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis