Storylines: an alternative approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change

Theodore G. Shepherd(University of Reading), Emily Boyd(Lund University), Raphael Calel(Public Policy Institute of California), S. C. Chapman(Boston University), Suraje Dessai(University of Leeds), Ioana Dima-West(European Council of International Schools), Hayley J. Fowler(Newcastle University), Rachel James(University of Cape Town), Douglas Maraun(University of Graz), Olivia Martius(University of Bern), C. A. Senior(Met Office), Adam H. Sobel(Columbia University), David A. Stainforth(University of Warwick), Simon F. B. Tett(University of Edinburgh), Kevin E. Trenberth(NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research), Bart van den Hurk(Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute), N. W. Watkins(Boston University), Robert L. Wilby(Loughborough University), Dimitri Zenghelis(London School of Economics and Political Science)
Climatic Change
November 10, 2018
Cited by 749Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

As climate change research becomes increasingly applied, the need for actionable information is growing rapidly. A key aspect of this requirement is the representation of uncertainties. The conventional approach to representing uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change is probabilistic, based on ensembles of climate model simulations. In the face of deep uncertainties, the known limitations of this approach are becoming increasingly apparent. An alternative is thus emerging which may be called a 'storyline' approach. We define a storyline as a physically self-consistent unfolding of past events, or of plausible future events or pathways. No a priori probability of the storyline is assessed; emphasis is placed instead on understanding the driving factors involved, and the plausibility of those factors. We introduce a typology of four reasons for using storylines to represent uncertainty in physical aspects of climate change: (i) improving risk awareness by framing risk in an event-oriented rather than a probabilistic manner, which corresponds more directly to how people perceive and respond to risk; (ii) strengthening decision-making by allowing one to work backward from a particular vulnerability or decision point, combining climate change information with other relevant factors to address compound risk and develop appropriate stress tests; (iii) providing a physical basis for partitioning uncertainty, thereby allowing the use of more credible regional models in a conditioned manner and (iv) exploring the boundaries of plausibility, thereby guarding against false precision and surprise. Storylines also offer a powerful way of linking physical with human aspects of climate change.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis