A randomized trial of three novel regimens for recurrent acute myeloid leukemia demonstrates the continuing challenge of treating this difficult disease

Mark R. Litzow(Mayo Clinic), Xin V. Wang(Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Martin Carroll(Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania), Judith E. Karp(Johns Hopkins University), Rhett P. Ketterling(Mayo Clinic), Yanming Zhang(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center), Scott H. Kaufmann(Mayo Clinic), Hillard M. Lazarus(University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center), Selina M. Luger(Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania), Elisabeth Paietta(Albert Einstein College of Medicine), Keith W. Pratz(Johns Hopkins University), Han W. Tun(Jacksonville College), Jessica K. Altman(Northwestern University), E. Randolph Broun(Oncology Hematology Care), Witold B. Rybka(Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center), Jacob M. Rowe(Shaare Zedek Medical Center), Martin S. Tallman(Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center)
American Journal of Hematology
October 29, 2018
Cited by 27Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

To improve the outcome of relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a randomized phase II trial of three novel regimens was conducted. Ninety patients were enrolled and were in first relapse or were refractory to induction/re-induction chemotherapy. They were randomized to the following regimens: carboplatin-topotecan (CT), each by continuous infusion for 5 days; alvocidib (formerly flavopiridol), cytarabine, and mitoxantrone (FLAM) in a timed sequential regimen; or sirolimus combined with mitoxantrone, etoposide, and cytarabine (S-MEC). The primary objective was attainment of a complete remission (CR). A Simon two-stage design was used for each of the three arms. The median age of the patients in the FLAM arm was older at 62 years compared with 55 years for the CT arm and the S-MEC arm. The overall response was 14% in the CT arm (5/35, 90% CI 7%-35%), 28% in the FLAM arm (10/36, 90% CI, 16%-43%), and 16% in the S-MEC arm (3/19, 90% CI, 4%-36%). There were nine treatment-related deaths, seven of which occurred in the FLAM arm with four of these in elderly patients. We conclude that the FLAM regimen had an encouraging response rate and should be considered for further clinical development but should be used with caution in elderly patients.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis