Version 3 of the National Alzheimer’s Coordinating Center’s Uniform Data Set

Lilah M. Besser(University of Washington), Walter A. Kukull(University of Washington), David S. Knopman(Mayo Clinic in Arizona), Helena C. Chui(University of Southern California), Douglas Galasko(University of California San Diego), Sandra Weıntraub(Northwestern University), Gregory A. Jicha(University of Kentucky), Cynthia M. Carlsson(Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center), Jeffrey M. Burns(University of Kansas), Joseph F. Quinn(Oregon Health & Science University), Robert A. Sweet(University of Southern California), Katya Rascovsky(University of Pittsburgh), Merilee Teylan(University of Washington), Duane Beekly(University of Washington), George E. Thomas(University of Washington), Mark Bollenbeck(University of Washington), Sarah E. Monsell(University of Washington), Charles Mock(University of Washington), Xiao‐Hua Zhou(University of Washington), Nicole M. Thomas(University of Washington), Elizabeth Robichaud(University of Washington), Margaret Dean(University of Washington), Janene L. Hubbard(University of Washington), Mary Jacka(University of Washington), Kristen Schwabe‐Fry(University of Washington), Joylee Wu(University of Washington), Creighton H. Phelps(National Institute on Aging), John C. Morris(Washington University in St. Louis)
Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders
October 1, 2018
Cited by 510Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 2015, the US Alzheimer's Disease Centers (ADC) implemented Version 3 of the Uniform Data Set (UDS). This paper describes the history of Version 3 development and the UDS data that are freely available to researchers. METHODS: UDS Version 3 was developed after years of coordination between the National Institute on Aging-appointed Clinical Task Force (CTF), clinicians from ∼30 ADCs, and the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC). The CTF recognized the need for updates to align with the state of the science in dementia research, while being flexible to the diverse needs and diseases studied at the ADCs. Version 3 also developed a nonproprietary neuropsychological battery. RESULTS: This paper focuses on the substantial Version 3 changes to the UDS forms related to clinical diagnosis and characterization of clinical symptoms to match updated consensus-based diagnostic criteria. Between March 2015 and March 2018, 4820 participants were enrolled using UDS Version 3. Longitudinal data were available for 25,337 of the 37,568 total participants using all UDS versions. DISCUSSION: The results from utilization of the UDS highlight the possibility for numerous research institutions to successfully collaborate, produce, and use standardized data collection instruments for over a decade.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis