Removal capacity of different high‐flux dialyzers during postdilution online hemodiafiltration

Alba Santos García(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Nicolás Macías Carmona(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Almudena Vega Martínez(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Soraya Abad Estébanez(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Tania Linares Grávalos(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Inés Aragoncillo Sauco(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Úrsula Verdalles Guzmán(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Nayara Panizo(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón), Leónidas Cruzado Vega(Hospital General Universitario de Elche), Juan Manuel López Gómez(Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón)
Hemodialysis International
October 27, 2018
Cited by 9

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to compare molecule removal and albumin leakage in postdilution online hemodiafiltration with different high-flux dialyzers. METHODS: We studied seven high-flux dialyzers (Polyflux 210H®, Evodial 2.2®, FxCordiax1000®, Elisio21H®, TS-2.1SL®, XevontaHi20®, VitaPES 210-HF®) in 6 patients. The reduction ratio (RR) of small- and middle-sized molecules was calculated. Dialysate samples were collected to estimate the albumin leakage. FINDINGS: Global differences between dialyzers were observed in the RR of ß2 microglobulin (P =0.003) and prolactin (P =0.013). The mean loss of albumin in the dialysate per session varied between 114 ± 67 mg (with Evodial 2.2) and 2621 ± 1363 mg per session (with XevontaHi20). We found global differences between dialyzers in total albumin loss (P = 0.05). DISCUSSION: We demonstrated that the performance of high-flux dialyzers was different among the types and that not all high-flux dialyzers should be considered equal.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis