Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS<sup>®</sup>) Society Recommendations

Donald E. Low(Virginia Mason Medical Center), William Allum(Royal Marsden Hospital), Giovanni De Manzoni(University of Verona), Lorenzo Ferri(McGill University Health Centre), Arul Immanuel(Newcastle upon Tyne Hospital), MadhanKumar Kuppusamy(Virginia Mason Medical Center), Simon Law(Queen Mary Hospital), Mats Lindblad(Karolinska Institutet), Nick Maynard(John Radcliffe Hospital), Joseph M. Neal(Virginia Mason Medical Center), C.S. Pramesh(Tata Memorial Hospital), Mike Scott(Virginia Commonwealth University), B. Mark Smithers(The University of Queensland), Valérie Addor(University Hospital of Lausanne), Olle Ljungqvist(Örebro University)
World Journal of Surgery
October 1, 2018
Cited by 592

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs provide a format for multidisciplinary care and has been shown to predictably improve short term outcomes associated with surgical procedures. Esophagectomy has historically been associated with significant levels of morbidity and mortality and as a result routine application and audit of ERAS guidelines specifically designed for esophageal resection has significant potential to improve outcomes associated with this complex procedure. METHODS: A team of international experts in the surgical management of esophageal cancer was assembled and the existing literature was identified and reviewed prior to the production of the guidelines. Well established procedure specific components of ERAS were reviewed and updated with changes relevant to esophagectomy. Procedure specific, operative and technical sections were produced utilizing the best current level of evidence. All sections were rated regarding the level of evidence and overall recommendation according to the evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS: Thirty-nine sections were ultimately produced and assessed for quality of evidence and recommendations. Some sections were completely new to ERAS programs due to the fact that esophagectomy is the first guideline with a thoracic component to the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The current ERAS society guidelines should be reviewed and applied in all centers looking to improve outcomes and quality associated with esophageal resection.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis