Assessment of PD-L1 expression across breast cancer molecular subtypes, in relation to mutation rate, <i>BRCA1</i>-like status, tumor-infiltrating immune cells and survival

Marcelo Sobral‐Leite(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Koen Van de Vijver(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Magali Michaut(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Rianne van der Linden(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Gerrit K. Hooijer(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), Hugo M. Horlings(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Tesa Severson(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Anna Marie Mulligan(University Health Network), Nayana Weerasooriya(University Health Network), Joyce Sanders(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Annuska M. Glas(Agendia (Netherlands)), Diederik Wehkamp(Agendia (Netherlands)), Lorenza Mittempergher(Agendia (Netherlands)), Kelly Kersten(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Ashley Cimino‐Mathews(Johns Hopkins Hospital), Dennis Peters(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Erik Hooijberg(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Annegien Broeks(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Marc J. van de Vijver(Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam), René Bernards(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Irene L. Andrulis(University of Toronto), Marleen Kok(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Karin E. de Visser(Agendia (Netherlands)), Marjanka K. Schmidt(The Netherlands Cancer Institute)
OncoImmunology
September 11, 2018
Cited by 119Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

To better understand the expression pattern of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in different breast cancer types, we characterized PD-L1 expression in tumor and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, in relation to mutation rate, BRCA1-like status and survival. We analyzed 410 primary treatment-naive breast tumors comprising 162 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) and HER2−, 101 HER2+ and 147 triple-negative (TN) cancers. Pathologists quantified tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and PD-L1 expression in tumor cells and TILs using whole slides and tissue microarray. Mutation rate was assessed by DNA sequencing, BRCA1-like status using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and immune landscape by multiplex image analyses of CD4, CD68, CD8, FOXP3, cytokeratin, and PD-L1. Half of PD-L1 scores evaluated by tissue microarray were false negatives compared to whole slide evaluations. We observed at least 1% of PD-L1-positive (PD-L1+) cells in 53.1% of ER+HER2−, 73.3% of HER2+, and 84.4% of TN tumors. PD-L1 expression was higher in ductal compared to lobular carcinomas, also within ER+HER2− tumors (p = 0.04). High PD-L1+ TILs score (> 50%) was independently associated with better outcome in TN tumors (HR = 0.27; 95%CI = 0.10–0.69). Within TN tumors, PD-L1 and TIL scores showed a modest but significant positive association with the number of silent mutations, but no association with BRCA1-like status. Multiplex image analyses indicated that PD-L1 is expressed on multiple immune cells (CD68+ macrophages, CD4+, FOXP3+, and CD8+ T cells) in the breast tumor microenvironment, independent of the PD-L1 status of the tumor cells. We found no evidence that levels of PD-L1+ TILs in TN breast cancer are driven by high mutation rate or BRCA1-like status.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis