Multidisciplinary management of recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection: an international expert consensus

Tianfu Wen(Sichuan University), Jin Chen(Sichuan University), Antonio Facciorusso(University of Foggia), Matteo Donadon(Humanitas University), Ho‐Seong Han(Seoul National University Bundang Hospital), Yilei Mao(Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Chaoliu Dai(China Medical University), Shuqun Cheng(Second Military Medical University), Bixiang Zhang(Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Baogang Peng(The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University), Shunda Du(Peking Union Medical College Hospital), Changjun Jia(China Medical University), Feng Xu(China Medical University), Jie Shi(Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital), Juxian Sun(Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital), Peng Zhu(Huazhong University of Science and Technology), Satoshi Nara(Sichuan University), J. Michael Millis(Sichuan University)
HepatoBiliary Surgery and Nutrition
September 1, 2018
Cited by 115Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth-most common cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. However, 40-70% patients eventually suffer from postoperative recurrence within 5 years. HCC recurrence after surgery severely affects prognosis of the patients. Nevertheless, there is an opportunity to improve patients' prognosis if doctors and researchers can recognize the importance of a standardized perioperative management and study it in clinical and pre-clinical settings. Hence, based on our own experience and published studies from other researchers, we develop this consensus regarding multidisciplinary management of locally recurrent and metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma after resection. This consensus consists of the entire course of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (RHCC) management, including prediction of recurrence, prevention, diagnosis, treatment and surveillance of RHCC. Consensus recommendations are presented with grades of evidences (Ia, Ib, IIa, IIb, III and IV), and strength of recommendations (A, B, C, D and E). We also develop a decision-making path for RHCC treatment, which can intuitively demonstrate the management for RHCC. It is hoped that we may make some effort to standardize the management of RHCC and ultimately understand how to improve outcomes.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis