Prospects and challenges of environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring in freshwater ponds

Lynsey R. Harper(University of Hull), Andrew S. Buxton(University of Kent), Helen C. Rees(University of Nottingham), Kat Bruce(Novametrics (United Kingdom)), Rein Brys(Research Institute for Nature and Forest), David Halfmaerten(Research Institute for Nature and Forest), Daniel S. Read(UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology), Hayley V. Watson(University of Hull), Carl D. Sayer(University College London), Eleanor P. Jones(Fera Science (United Kingdom)), Victoria Priestley(Imperial College London), Elvira Mächler(ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences), Cesc Múrria(Universitat de Barcelona), Sandra Garcés‐Pastor(UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Cecilia Medupin(University of Manchester), Katherine B. Burgess(Natural England), G. B. G. Benson(Natural England), Neil Boonham(Fera Science (United Kingdom)), Richard A. Griffiths(University of Kent), Lori Lawson Handley(University of Hull), Bernd Hänfling(University of Hull)
Hydrobiologia
September 3, 2018
Cited by 266Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a rapid, non-invasive, cost-efficient biodiversity monitoring tool with enormous potential to inform aquatic conservation and management. Development is ongoing, with strong commercial interest, and new uses are continually being discovered. General applications of eDNA and guidelines for best practice in freshwater systems have been established, but habitat-specific assessments are lacking. Ponds are highly diverse, yet understudied systems that could benefit from eDNA monitoring. However, eDNA applications in ponds and methodological constraints specific to these environments remain unaddressed. Following a stakeholder workshop in 2017, researchers combined knowledge and expertise to review these applications and challenges that must be addressed for the future and consistency of eDNA monitoring in ponds. The greatest challenges for pond eDNA surveys are representative sampling, eDNA capture, and potential PCR inhibition. We provide recommendations for sampling, eDNA capture, inhibition testing, and laboratory practice, which should aid new and ongoing eDNA projects in ponds. If implemented, these recommendations will contribute towards an eventual broad standardisation of eDNA research and practice, with room to tailor workflows for optimal analysis and different applications. Such standardisation will provide more robust, comparable, and ecologically meaningful data to enable effective conservation and management of pond biodiversity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis