CNS Response to Osimertinib Versus Standard Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Patients With Untreated <i>EGFR</i>-Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Thanyanan Reungwetwattana(Shikoku Cancer Center), Kazuhiko Nakagawa(Shikoku Cancer Center), Byoung Chul Cho(Shikoku Cancer Center), Manuel Cobo(Shikoku Cancer Center), Eun Kyung Cho(Shikoku Cancer Center), Alessandro Bertolini(Shikoku Cancer Center), Sabine Bohnet(Shikoku Cancer Center), Caicun Zhou(Shikoku Cancer Center), Ki Hyeong Lee(Shikoku Cancer Center), Naoyuki Nogami(Shikoku Cancer Center), Isamu Okamoto(Shikoku Cancer Center), Natasha B. Leighl(Shikoku Cancer Center), Rachel Hodge(Shikoku Cancer Center), Astrid McKeown(Shikoku Cancer Center), Andy Brown(Shikoku Cancer Center), Yuri Rukazenkov(Shikoku Cancer Center), Suresh S. Ramalingam(Shikoku Cancer Center), Johan Vansteenkiste(Shikoku Cancer Center)
Journal of Clinical Oncology
August 28, 2018
Cited by 784Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Purpose We report CNS efficacy of osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer from the phase III FLAURA study. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 556) were randomly assigned to osimertinib or standard EGFR-TKIs (gefitinib or erlotinib); brain scans were not mandated unless clinically indicated. Patients with asymptomatic or stable CNS metastases were included. In patients with symptomatic CNS metastases, neurologic status was required to be stable for ≥ 2 weeks after completion of definitive therapy and corticosteroids. A preplanned subgroup analysis with CNS progression-free survival as primary objective was conducted in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiologic review. The CNS evaluable-for-response set included patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Results Of 200 patients with available brain scans at baseline, 128 (osimertinib, n = 61; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 67) had measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, including 41 patients (osimertinib, n = 22; standard EGFR-TKIs, n = 19) with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion. Median CNS progression-free survival in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions was not reached with osimertinib (95% CI, 16.5 months to not calculable) and 13.9 months (95% CI, 8.3 months to not calculable) with standard EGFR-TKIs (hazard ratio, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86; P = .014 [nominally statistically significant]). CNS objective response rates were 91% and 68% in patients with ≥ one measurable CNS lesion (odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 0.9 to 34.9; P = .066) and 66% and 43% in patients with measurable and/or nonmeasurable CNS lesions (odds ratio, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.2; P = .011) treated with osimertinib and standard EGFR-TKIs, respectively. Probability of experiencing a CNS progression event was consistently lower with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs. Conclusion Osimertinib has CNS efficacy in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer. These results suggest a reduced risk of CNS progression with osimertinib versus standard EGFR-TKIs.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis