Surgical Standards for Management of the Axilla in Breast Cancer Clinical Trials with Pathological Complete Response Endpoint

Judy C. Boughey(Mayo Clinic), Michael Alvarado(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), Rachael Lancaster(University of Alabama at Birmingham), W. Fraser Symmans(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Rita A. Mukhtar(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), Jasmine Wong(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), Cheryl A. Ewing(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), David A. Potter(University of Minnesota), Todd M. Tuttle(University of Minnesota), Tina J. Hieken(Mayo Clinic), Jodi M. Carter(Mayo Clinic), James W. Jakub(Mayo Clinic), Henry G. Kaplan(Swedish Medical Center), Claire Buchanan(Swedish Medical Center), Nora Jaskowiak(University of Chicago), Husain Sattar(University of Chicago), Jeffrey Mueller(University of Chicago), Rita Nanda(University of Chicago), Claudine Isaacs(Georgetown University), Paula R. Pohlmann(Georgetown University), Filipa Lynce(Georgetown University), Eleni A. Tousimis(Georgetown University), Jay Zeck(Georgetown University), Marie Catherine Lee(Moffitt Cancer Center), Julie E. Lang(University of Southern California), Paulette Mhawech‐Fauceglia(University of Southern California), Roshni Rao(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Bret Taback(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Constantine Godellas(Loyola University Medical Center), Margaret Chen(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Kevin Kalinsky(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Hanina Hibshoosh(Columbia University Irving Medical Center), Brigid K. Killelea(Yale Cancer Center), Tara Sanft(Yale Cancer Center), Gillian L. Hirst(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), Smita Asare(Quantum Leap Healthcare Collaborative), Jeffrey B. Matthews(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), Jane Perlmutter(National Patient Safety Foundation), Laura J. Esserman(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), and I-SPY 2 Investigators(UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center), A. Jo Chien(University of Alabama at Birmingham), Andres Forero‐Torres(University of Minnesota), Douglas Yee(University of Minnesota), Erin D. Ellis(Swedish Medical Center), Heather Han(University of Southern California), Janice Lu(University of Southern California), Anne M. Wallace(Moffitt Cancer Center), Kathy S. Albain(University of California San Diego), Anthony Elias(University of Pennsylvania), Amy S. Clark(University of Pennsylvania), Kathleen Kemmer
npj Breast Cancer
August 6, 2018
Cited by 35Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Advances in the surgical management of the axilla in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, especially those with node positive disease at diagnosis, have led to changes in practice and more judicious use of axillary lymph node dissection that may minimize morbidity from surgery. However, there is still significant confusion about how to optimally manage the axilla, resulting in variation among practices. From the viewpoint of drug development, assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains paramount and appropriate assessment of residual disease-the primary endpoint of many drug therapy trials in the neoadjuvant setting-is critical. Therefore decreasing the variability, especially in a multicenter clinical trial setting, and establishing a minimum standard to ensure consistency in clinical trial data, without mandating axillary lymph node dissection, for all patients is necessary. The key elements which include proper staging and identification of nodal involvement at diagnosis, and appropriately targeted management of the axilla at the time of surgical resection are presented. The following protocols have been adopted as standard procedure by the I-SPY2 trial for management of axilla in patients with node positive disease, and present a framework for prospective clinical trials and practice.


Related Papers