2017 WSES guidelines on colon and rectal cancer emergencies: obstruction and perforation

Michele Pisano(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Luigi Zorcolo(University of Cagliari), Cecilia Merli(Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena), Stefania Cimbanassi(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Elia Poiasina(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Marco Ceresoli(University of Milan), Ferdinando Agresta(Regione del Veneto), Niccolò Allievi(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Giovanni Bellanova(Ospedale SS. Annunziata), Federico Coccolini(Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena), Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Paola Fugazzola(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Carlos Augusto Real Martinez(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Giulia Montori(University of Bergamo), Ciro Paolillo(University of Udine), Thiago José Penachim(Hospital São Paulo), Bruno M. Pereira(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Tarcisio Reis(Hospital Universitário Oswaldo Cruz), Angelo Restivo(University of Cagliari), João Rezende-Neto(University of Toronto), Massimo Sartelli(University of Macerata), Massimo Valentino(Ospedale Sant Antonio), Fikri M. Abu‐Zidan(United Arab Emirates University), Itamar Ashkenazi(Hillel Yaffe Medical Center), Miklosh Bala(Hadassah Medical Center), Osvaldo Chiara(Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda), Nicola De Angelis(Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor), Simona Deidda(University of Cagliari), Belinda De Simone(Centre Hospitalier de Cannes), Salomone Di Saverio(Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust), Elena Finotti(Regione del Veneto), Kenji Inaba(University of Southern California), Ernest E. Moore(Denver Health Medical Center), Steven D. Wexner(Cleveland Clinic Florida), Walter Biffl(Queen's Medical Center), Raúl Coimbra(UC San Diego Health System), Angelo Guttadauro(University of Milan), Ari Leppäniemi(Herttoniemi Hospital), Ron Maier(Harborview Medical Center), Stefano Magnone(Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII), Alain Chicom Mefire(University of Buea), Andrew Peitzmann(University of Pittsburgh), Boris Sakakushev(Medical University Plovdiv), Michael Sugrue(Letterkenny University Hospital), Pierluigi Viale(University of Bologna), Dieter Weber(Royal Perth Hospital), Jeffry L. Kashuk(Assuta Medical Center), Gustavo Pereira Fraga(Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)), Ioran Kluger(Rambam Health Care Campus), Fausto Catena, Luca Ansaloni(Ospedale “M. Bufalini” di Cesena)
World Journal of Emergency Surgery
August 13, 2018
Cited by 383Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

ᅟ: Obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer represent challenging matters in terms of diagnosis, life-saving strategies, obstruction resolution and oncologic challenge. The aims of the current paper are to update the previous WSES guidelines for the management of large bowel perforation and obstructive left colon carcinoma (OLCC) and to develop new guidelines on obstructive right colon carcinoma (ORCC). Methods: The literature was extensively queried for focused publication until December 2017. Precise analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group formed by a pool of experts: the statements and literature review were presented, discussed and voted at the Consensus Conference of the 4th Congress of the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) held in Campinas in May 2017. Results: CT scan is the best imaging technique to evaluate large bowel obstruction and perforation. For OLCC, self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS), when available, offers interesting advantages as compared to emergency surgery; however, the positioning of SEMS for surgically treatable causes carries some long-term oncologic disadvantages, which are still under analysis. In the context of emergency surgery, resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) is preferable to Hartmann's procedure, whenever the characteristics of the patient and the surgeon are permissive. Right-sided loop colostomy is preferable in rectal cancer, when preoperative therapies are predicted.With regards to the treatment of ORCC, right colectomy represents the procedure of choice; alternatives, such as internal bypass and loop ileostomy, are of limited value.Clinical scenarios in the case of perforation might be dramatic, especially in case of free faecal peritonitis. The importance of an appropriate balance between life-saving surgical procedures and respect of oncologic caveats must be stressed. In selected cases, a damage control approach may be required.Medical treatments including appropriate fluid resuscitation, early antibiotic treatment and management of co-existing medical conditions according to international guidelines must be delivered to all patients at presentation. Conclusions: The current guidelines offer an extensive overview of available evidence and a qualitative consensus regarding management of large bowel obstruction and perforation due to colorectal cancer.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis