Clinical chemistry score versus high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I and T tests alone to identify patients at low or high risk for myocardial infarction or death at presentation to the emergency department
Peter A. Kavsak(McMaster University), Andrew Worster(McMaster University), William Parsonage(Queensland University of Technology), Lauren E. Griffith(Impact), Jinhui Ma(McMaster University), Martin Than(Christchurch Hospital), Stefan Blankenberg(Universität Hamburg), Mark Richards(National University Health System), P.J. Devereaux(University of Limerick), Nils A. Sörensen(Universität Hamburg), Dirk Westermann(University Medical Center Freiburg), Richard W. Troughton(Canterbury Health Laboratories), Shamir R. Mehta(Population Health Research Institute), Francisco Ojeda(Universidad Complutense de Madrid), Louise Cullen(Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital), Jonathan Sherbino(McMaster University Medical Centre), John W. Pickering(Christchurch Hospital), Colleen Shortt(Universität Hamburg), Jaimi Greenslade(Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital), Sally Aldous(Christchurch Hospital), Matthew McQueen(Population Health Research Institute), Natasha Clayton(Universität Hamburg), Stephen Hill(Faraday Technology (United States)), Franz–Josef Neumann(Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen)
Cited by 46
Related Papers
Intraaortic Balloon Support for Myocardial Infarction with Cardiogenic Shock
|New England Journal of Medicine|2012|2.8k
SCORE2 risk prediction algorithms: new models to estimate 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease in Europe
|European Heart Journal|2021|1.7k
Relationship between Intraoperative Mean Arterial Pressure and Clinical Outcomes after Noncardiac Surgery
|Anesthesiology|2013|1.5k
2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery
|European Heart Journal|2022|1.1k
Cardiovascular Risk and Events in 17 Low-, Middle-, and High-Income Countries
|New England Journal of Medicine|2014|993