Impact of Frequency-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Guidance for Optimal Coronary Stent Implantation in Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance

Maoto Habara(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Kenya Nasu(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Mitsuyasu Terashima(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Hideaki Kaneda(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Daisuke Yokota(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Euihong Ko(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Tsuyoshi Ito(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Tairo Kurita(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Nobuyoshi Tanaka(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Masashi Kimura(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Tatsuya Ito(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Yoshihisa Kinoshita(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Etsuo Tsuchikane(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Keiko Asakura(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Yasushi Asakura(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Osamu Katoh(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association), Takahiko Suzuki(Norwegian Womens Public Health Association)
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
March 29, 2012
Cited by 140Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Frequency-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT) is a novel, high resolution intravascular imaging modality. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is a widely used conventional imaging modality for achieving optimal stent deployment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of FD-OCT guidance for coronary stent implantation compared with IVUS guidance. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 70 patients with de novo coronary artery lesions and either unstable or stable angina pectoris were enrolled in this randomized study (optical coherence tomography [OCT] group: n=35, IVUS group: n=35). In the OCT group, stent implantation was performed under FD-OCT guidance alone and final stent expansion was evaluated by IVUS. In the IVUS group, conventional IVUS guidance was used and final stent apposition was evaluated by FD-OCT. There were no significant differences regarding the procedural, fluoroscopy time, and contrast volume. Although device and clinical success rates also were similar, the visibility of vessel border was significantly lower in the OCT group (P<0.05). Minimum and mean stent area and focal and diffuse stent expansion were smaller (6.1±2.2 mm versus 7.1±2.1 mm, 7.5±2.5 versus 8.7±2.4 mm, 64.7±13.7% versus 80.3±13.4%, 84.2±15.8% versus 98.8±16.5%, P<0.05, respectively), and the frequency of significant residual reference segment stenosis at the proximal edge was higher in the OCT group (P<0.05). Incomplete apposed struts in both groups were similar (P=0.34). CONCLUSIONS: FD-OCT guidance for stent implantation was associated with smaller stent expansion and more frequent significant residual reference segment stenosis compared with conventional IVUS guidance.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis