Relative Impact of HLA Matching and Non-HLA Donor Characteristics on Outcomes of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome

Francis Ayuk(Universität Hamburg), Dietrich W. Beelen(Essen University Hospital), Martin Bornhäuser(Technische Universität Dresden), Matthias Stelljes(University Hospital Münster), Tatjana Zabelina(Universität Hamburg), Jürgen Finke(University Medical Center Freiburg), Guido Kobbe(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Daniel Wolff(University Hospital Regensburg), Eva-Maria Wagner(Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz), Maximilian Christopeit(Universität Hamburg), Christoph Schmid(University Hospital Augsburg), Hellmut Ottinger, Christoph Groth(University Hospital Münster), Christoph Faul(University of Tübingen), Hartmut Bertz(University Medical Center Freiburg), Elena Rachlis(Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf), Christine Wolschke(Universität Hamburg), Johannes Schetelig(Technische Universität Dresden), Péter Horn(Essen University Hospital), Joannis Mytilineos, Martina Guellstorf(Universität Hamburg), Reinhard Kelsch(University of Münster), Katharina Fleischhauer(Essen University Hospital), Nicolaus Kröger(Universität Hamburg), Wolfgang Bethge(University of Tübingen)
Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
July 23, 2018
Cited by 60Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

Increasing donor-recipient HLA disparity is associated with negative outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its comparative relevance amid non-HLA donor characteristics is not well established. We addressed this question in 3215 HSCTs performed between 2005 and 2013 in Germany for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Donors were HLA-matched related (MRD; n = 872) or unrelated (10/10 MUD, n = 1553) or HLA-mismatched unrelated (<10/10 MMUD, n = 790). Overall survival (OS) was similar after MRD compared with 10/10 MUD HSCT, reflecting opposing hazards of relapse (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; P < .002) and nonrelapse mortality (HR, .63; P < .001). After UD HSCT, increasing HLA disparity was associated with inferior OS (HR, 1.21 [P < .02] and HR, 1.57 [P < .001] for 9/10 and ≤8/10 MMUD, respectively, compared with 10/10 MUD). Among non-HLA donor characteristics, age, sex mismatching (male recipient-female donor), and cytomegalovirus (CMV) mismatching (positive recipient-negative donor) impacted OS. Multivariate subgroup analysis showed that OS was similar after HSCT from the youngest 9/10 MMUD (<30 years) compared with the oldest 10/10 MUD (>40 years) (HR, 1.18; P = .25) and also in male patients transplanted from female 10/10 MUD compared with male 9/10 MMUD (HR, .89; P = .46). In contrast, OS of CMV-positive patients tended to be better with CMV-negative 10/10 MUDs compared with CMV-positive 9/10 MMUDs (HR, 1.31; P = .04). Because of low patient numbers in subgroups, definite conclusions and establishment of a hierarchy among HLA matching and non-HLA donor characteristics could not be made. Our data suggest that the impact of donor age and sex mismatch but not CMV mismatch on outcome of allogeneic HSCT may be comparable with that of single HLA disparity.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis