Risk stratification of high‐risk metastatic neuroblastoma: A report from the HR‐NBL‐1/SIOPEN study

Daniel A. Morgenstern(University of Toronto), Ulrike Pötschger(St Anna Children's Hospital), Lucas Moreno(Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús), Vassilios Papadakis(Iaso Children’s Hospital), Cormac Owens(Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin), Shifra Ash(Schneider Children's Medical Center), Claudia Pasqualini(Institut Gustave Roussy), Roberto Luksch(Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori), Alberto Garaventa(Istituto Giannina Gaslini), Adela Cañete(Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe), Martin Elliot(Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust), Aleksandra Wieczorek(Jagiellonian University), Geneviève Laureys(Ghent University Hospital), Per Kogner(Karolinska University Hospital), Josef Mališ(University Hospital in Motol), Ellen Ruud(Oslo University Hospital), Maja Beck‐Popovic(University Hospital of Lausanne), Gudrun Schleiermacher(Institut Curie), Dominique Valteau‐Couanet(Institut Gustave Roussy), Ruth Ladenstein(St Anna Children's Hospital)
Pediatric Blood & Cancer
July 17, 2018
Cited by 75Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification is crucial to treatment decision-making in neuroblastoma. This study aimed to explore factors present at diagnosis affecting outcome in patients aged ≥18 months with metastatic neuroblastoma and to develop a simple risk score for prognostication. PROCEDURE: Data were derived from the European high-risk neuroblastoma 1 (HR-NBL1)/International Society for Paediatric Oncology European Neuroblastoma (SIOPEN) trial with analysis restricted to patients aged ≥18 months with metastatic disease and treated prior to the introduction of immunotherapy. Primary endpoint was 5-year event-free survival (EFS). Prognostic factors assessed were sex, age, tumour MYCN amplification (MNA) status, serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)/ferritin, primary tumour and metastatic sites. Factors significant in univariate analysis were incorporated into a multi-variable model and an additive scoring system developed based on estimated log-cumulative hazard ratios. RESULTS: The cohort included 1053 patients with median follow-up 5.5 years and EFS 27 ± 1%. In univariate analyses, age; serum LDH and ferritin; involvement of bone marrow, bone, liver or lung; and >1 metastatic system/compartment were associated with worse EFS. Tumour MNA was not associated with worse EFS. A multi-variable model and risk score incorporating age (>5 years, 2 points), serum LDH (>1250 U/L, 1 point) and number of metastatic systems (>1, 2 points) were developed. EFS was significantly correlated with risk score: EFS 52 ± 9% for score = 0 versus 6 ± 3% for score = 5 (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: A simple score can identify an "ultra-high risk" (UHR) cohort (score = 5) comprising 8% of patients with 5-year EFS <10%. These patients appear not to benefit from induction therapy and could potentially be directed earlier to alternative experimental therapies in future trials.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis