Pathological assessment of resection specimens after neoadjuvant therapy for metastatic melanoma

M.T. Tetzlaff(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Jane L. Messina(Moffitt Cancer Center), Julie E. Stein(Johns Hopkins Medicine), Xiaowei Xu(Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania), Rodabe N. Amaria(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Christian U. Blank(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Bart A. van de Wiel(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Peter M. Ferguson(University of Sydney), Robert V. Rawson(University of Sydney), Merrick I. Ross(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Andrew J. Spillane(University of Sydney), Jeffrey E. Gershenwald(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Robyn P.M. Saw(University of Sydney), Alexander C. J. van Akkooi(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Winan J. van Houdt(The Netherlands Cancer Institute), Tara C. Mitchell(Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania), Alexander M. Menzies(Royal North Shore Hospital), Georgina V. Long(University of Sydney), Jennifer A. Wargo(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Michael A. Davies(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Víctor G. Prieto(The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center), Janis M. Taube(Johns Hopkins University), Richard A. Scolyer(Royal Prince Alfred Hospital)
Annals of Oncology
June 23, 2018
Cited by 266Open Access
Full Text

Abstract

BackgroundClinical trials have recently evaluated safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy among patients with surgically resectable regional melanoma metastases. To capture informative prognostic data connected to pathological response in such trials, it is critical to standardize pathologic assessment and reporting of tumor response after this treatment.MethodsThe International Neoadjuvant Melanoma Consortium meetings in 2016 and 2017 assembled pathologists from academic centers to develop consensus guidelines for pathologic examination and reporting of surgical specimens from AJCC (8th edition) stage IIIB/C/D or oligometastatic stage IV melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant-targeted or immune therapy. Patterns of pathologic response are provided context to inform these guidelines.ResultsBased on our collective experience and guided by efforts in well-established neoadjuvant settings like breast cancer, procedures directing handling of pre- and post-neoadjuvant therapy–treated melanoma specimens are provided to facilitate comparison of findings across different trials and centers. Definitions of pathologic response are provided together with guidelines for reporting and quantifying the extent of pathologic response. Finally, the spectrum of histopathologic responses observed following neoadjuvant-targeted and immune-checkpoint therapy is described and illustrated.ConclusionsStandardizing pathologic evaluation of resected melanoma metastases following neoadjuvant-targeted or immune-checkpoint therapy allows more robust stratification of patient outcomes. This includes recognizing the spectrum of histopathologic response patterns to neoadjuvant therapy and a standard approach to grading pathologic responses. Such an approach will facilitate comparison of results across clinical trials and inform ongoing correlative studies into the mechanisms of response and resistance to agents applied in the neoadjuvant setting.


Related Papers

No related papers found

Powered by citation graph analysis