Optimization of OH-CEST contrast at 3T for clinical application of glucoCEST MRI
Chirayu Gandhi(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Moritz Zaiß(Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg), Silvio Aime(Synlab Czech (Czechia)), Kai Herz(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Annasofia Anemone(University of Turin), Klaus Scheffler(University Hospital of Basel), TM Lindig, Benjamin Bender(University of Tübingen), A Deshmane(Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics), Dario Livio Longo
Max Planck Digital Library
June 1, 2018
Cited by 1
Related Papers
Pros and cons of ultra-high-field MRI/MRS for human application
|Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy|2018|542
Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra
|Journal of Magnetic Resonance|2011|326
Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) and MR<i>Z</i>-spectroscopy<i>in vivo</i>: a review of theoretical approaches and methods
|Physics in Medicine and Biology|2013|320
Inverse <i>Z</i>‐spectrum analysis for spillover‐, MT‐, and <i>T</i><sub>1</sub>‐corrected steady‐state pulsed CEST‐MRI – application to pH‐weighted MRI of acute stroke
|NMR in Biomedicine|2014|311
Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers annual
|Elsevier eBooks|1987|270